Answer:
345.38+195.65+((345.38×(0.0175÷12))
=541.53
Funny cause I just did something similar a few minutes ago
Answer:
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean temperature is different from 42 deg
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given information, we are being told that:
The manufacturer of a refrigerator system for beer kegs produces refrigerators that are supposed to maintain a true mean temperature, μ, of 42°F
i. e mean μ = 42
The owner of the brewery does not agree with the refrigerator manufacturer, and claims he can prove that the true mean temperature is incorrect.
Assuming that a hypothesis test of the claim has been conducted and that the conclusion is to reject the null hypothesis, state the conclusion in nontechnical terms.
From above;
The null and the alternative hypothesis can be computed as:

Here , the hypothesis test of the claim is the alternative hypothesis.
The conclusion based on the decision rule: is to reject the null hypothesis
∴
The conclusion in non technical terms is that :
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean temperature is different from 42 deg
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a) if the population at the beginning of the year 2000 was 7500 people,
The 1-year percent change in the city's population would be
3.6/100 × 7500 = 270
b) The population after 1 year is
7500 - 270 = 7230
The percentage of the previous value of the population to its new value for each year is
7230/7500 × 100 = 96.4%
c) the 1-year growth factor for the population of the city would be
(1 - 0.036)^1 = 0.964
d) the function, g that determines the population of the city (in thousands of people) in terms of the number of years t since the beginning of 2000 would be
g = 7500(1 - 0.036)^t
g = 7500(0.964)^t