Answer: They collected 13,204 cans more than needed.
Answer:
A) ERROR
B) ∠C = 26°
Step-by-step explanation:
Houston, We have a problem!!! too much information
If we had a legit triangle, the law of sines would hold
19/sin138 = 8/sin20
28.395 = 23.390
as this is NOT an equality, the triangle does not exist as described.
IF it did, we'd get different results depending on which set we used
∠F = 180 - 138 - 20 = 22°
Law of sines
19/sin138 = DE/sin22 ⇒ DE = 19sin22/sin138 = <u>10.63697...</u>
or
8/sin20 = DE/sin22 ⇒ DE = 8sin22/sin20 = <u>8.762211...</u>
If we attempt to use Law of cosines
DE² = 19² + 8² - 2(19)(8)cos22 = <u>11.9639...</u>
so really none is correct because we attempt to use trig calculations to a non-triangle.
12) AC² = 15² + 19² - 2(15)(19)cos120
AC = 29.51270...
29.51270 / sin120 = 15/sinC
C = arcsin(15sin120/29.51270) = 26.1142... <u>26°</u>
I would say c cause i did the mathsss and i got 9 bucks
Answer:
H0 : ρ = 0
H1 : ρ ≠ 0
Test statistic = 1.197
Pvalue = 0.2335
There is no correlation between the two variables
Step-by-step explanation:
The null and alternative hypothesis :
H0 : No correlation exist,
H1 : Correlation exist
H0 : ρ = 0
H1 : ρ ≠ 0
Test statistic, T = r / √(1 - r²) / (n - 2)
T = 0.067 / √(1 - 0.067²) / (320 - 2)
T = 0.067 / √(0.995511 / 318)
T = 0.067 / 0.0559512
T = 1.197
The Pvalue obtained from the Rscore, at df = 320 - 2 = 318 is 0.2335
α = 5% = 0.05
The Pvalue > α ; we fail to reject the null and conclude that, there is no correlation between the two variables.
