I believe the correct answer is expert testimony. An expert is a person who is qualified by education or experience (or both) on a particular subject, has specific knowledge that is validated and relevant. The expert gives an opinion, but this opinion is supported by facts. It doesn't rely on any kind of subjective estimation, or statistical knowledge, as the case may always be an atypical one.
()- Predicate
**- Subject
*Clara* (went to the *mall* to buy *earrings*.)
A predicate is the noun, subject is like the verb, or what she/he would or will or is doing.
D) in contrast
Hope this helps!—xoxo
:)
In this passage from “The Wedding Night”, the author uses “vivid description” to develop the characters. So, option D) is the correct one.
Throughout the passage, there are several examples that reinforce the use of vivid descriptions such as “a sort of infinite intoxication which comes from the stars, the moon, the silver, glistening water”, “They are a glimpse of a different existence, an embellished, delicious existence”, “The night was magnificent, one of those nights which bring grand, vague ideas to the soul”.
Vivid descriptions are literary resources used to describe emotions and memories in a very clear and detailed way so that the reader produces those vivid images of the descriptions.
Option C does not apply to this part of the excerpt as there are no dialogues introduced. As regards direct and indirect characterization, the author is not describing the character’s personality through these literary resources.
Answer:
lol Heres sum for ya
Explanation:
An apple fell from the tree.
Because it was to heavy.
Carrots are grown in the ground.
Dug up once big enough.
Everyone loves big.
Falling apples bruise when to big.
Grapes don't fall because they are too small.
How is this allowed.
I think everyone should be allowed to fall regardless of size.
Just be equal to fruits.
There's a short prompt starting with letter A. You got what you asked for. :)
