Let the null hypothesis be that the agent's claim is correct. Using a standard normal probability table we find:
The p-value 0.14 is much larger than alpha = 0.01, so we cannot reject the agent's claim.
Ratios don't have to be "per" something, while rates are "per" something.
Ratios compare 2 or more values, as well as rates.
Okay, then ask an answer!
As we can see that the sides of the rectangle have been doubled
6.2 ft changed to 12.4 ft
Now when the sides have been doubled
the Perimeter will also be doubled
So the perimeter of new rectangle should be the double the perimeter of old rectangle
So perimeter of new rectangle = 2 (16 ) = 32 feet
Option C is correct
