The last answer option is correct. This option states that:
"You definitely have an insider’s view on this situation. Evidence from your own life shouldn’t be used to analyze another writer’s story, though."
<h2>Why would this be the peer reviewer's suggestion?</h2>
- A peer reviewer is someone who will give suggestions.
- These suggestions aim to make the text more coherent, efficient, and meaningful.
- In this case, a peer reviewer will give suggestions and how to improve the text and will show the author what should be removed or added.
In the case of the text Jaime, the peer reviewer must show how he cannot infer about the life of another writer based on evidence from his personal life. However, this inference must be made through evidence from the writer's own life.
More information about reviews in the link:
brainly.com/question/20466874
If the options are metaphor, alliteration, allusion, and apostrophe, I believe the answer is metaphor, because the others don't fit.
Alliteration is the repetition of a consonant.
Allusion is reference to something or somebody outside of that literary work.
And apostrophe is the author speaking directly to somebody outside the poem, usually gods or a muse.
The themes of<span> Montages of a Dream Deferred by Langston Hughes are the following:
•Aiming for your dream
•hold fast to your desires and and goals
•comparing </span><span> life to both a broken-winged bird and a barren and frozen field.</span>
All types of media mush consider the rating system however TV is solely based. If the amount of views goes down on a TV show, it is pulled from publicity.
