1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
taurus [48]
3 years ago
10

Why does this group of enslaved people in Massachusetts say that they should be free?

History
1 answer:
Natasha_Volkova [10]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Chattel slavery developed in Massachusetts in the first decades of colonial settlement, and it thrived well into the 18th century. Various forms of slavery in New England predated the establishment of the Plymouth Colony in 1620 and the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1630, but once established, colonists in both jurisdictions captured, purchased, and traded enslaved people—both African and Indigenous—on scale not previously seen in the region.[1] Although slavery in the United States is typically associated with the Caribbean and the Antebellum American South, enslaved people were prevalent throughout New England’s colonial history, and the practice was deeply embedded in the economic and social fabric of the region.[2]

The practice of slavery in Massachusetts was ended gradually, through case law. As an institution, it died out in the late 18th century through judicial actions litigated on behalf of slaves seeking manumission. Following England's lead, Lawyer Benjamin Kent represented slaves in court against their masters as early as 1752. He won the first case to liberate a slave in the United States in 1766. [3][4][5][6][7] The post-revolutionary court cases, starting in 1781, heard arguments contending that slavery was a violation of Christian principles and also a violation of the constitution of the commonwealth. 1783 saw additional high-profile court cases that began a general trend of slaves winning their emancipation on a case-by-case basis through lawsuit. As slavery dwindled in the last decade of the 18th century in Massachusetts, many of the instances where it remained, the slaveholders sometimes applied semantics of a name change to indentured servitude to maintain their property. The 1790 federal census, however, listed no slaves. Massachusetts was a center for the abolition movement in the 19th century. Legislation was passed that abolished slavery with the Thirteenth Amendment in 1865 was ratified by the stateExplanation:

You might be interested in
How many indians died in the trail of tears?
Lady_Fox [76]
I believe 4,000 Cherokee people
6 0
3 years ago
According to the declaration of independence what have the colonists been asking the king to do
SCORPION-xisa [38]

Answer:he colonists believed that King George III and the Parliament limited the colonists' individual rights by the acts that they passed. The colonists believed that their rights were limited by being taxed on various goods and services while at the same time, the money from these taxes did not benefit the colonies.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which part of Congress deals more with foreign relations and hears treaties?
ankoles [38]

answer:

b. senate

explanation:

  • the constitution provides that the president "shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the senate, to make treaties, provided two-thirds of the senators present concur"
5 0
3 years ago
How did McCarthyism limit the actions non-communists could take?|
levacccp [35]

Answer:

Non-communists were unfairly accused

Explanation:

McCarthyism - a vociferous campaign against alleged communists in the US government and other institutions carried out under Senator Joseph McCarthy in the period 1950–54. Many of the accused were blacklisted or lost their jobs, although most did not in fact belong to the Communist Party.

Therefore, the McCarthyism's limited the actions of non-communists, who had to be cautious, as to not be listed, as a "commie."

6 0
3 years ago
How can you use this document to argue that building the Great Wall was not worth the cost?
Svetach [21]

The  \: Great  \: Wall \:  of \\  China \:  was \:  not \:  worth \\  the \:  cost \:  because  \: of  \: all  \\ the  \: hardships \:  that \:  were \\  caused. \:  Many \:  deaths \:  were \:  caused \\  while \:  building  \: the \:  wall. ... \\  The\: wall \:builders\: and\: soldiers\\ received  \: very \:  little \:  food  \: as \\  they \:  were \:  working \:  (Doc E). \:  They \\  did \:  not \:  just \:  receive \:  food, \\  they \:  had  \: to \:  work  \: for \:  it  \: (Doc E).

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In 1571, the pope called on catholic rulers to attack which empire?
    15·1 answer
  • How did most African American immigrants differ from other racial or ethnic groups who came to the United States before 1808
    10·1 answer
  • Which describes the revisionist or conflict perspective in historiography?
    15·1 answer
  • Colored rule in a reconstructed state
    13·1 answer
  • What is the difference between saint domingue and haiti
    6·2 answers
  • Why was the League of Nations significant?
    6·2 answers
  • One of the most influential political machines was ? ​
    7·2 answers
  • What was the goal of the Crusades?
    12·2 answers
  • Plz help
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following movements
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!