1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
taurus [48]
3 years ago
10

Why does this group of enslaved people in Massachusetts say that they should be free?

History
1 answer:
Natasha_Volkova [10]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Chattel slavery developed in Massachusetts in the first decades of colonial settlement, and it thrived well into the 18th century. Various forms of slavery in New England predated the establishment of the Plymouth Colony in 1620 and the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1630, but once established, colonists in both jurisdictions captured, purchased, and traded enslaved people—both African and Indigenous—on scale not previously seen in the region.[1] Although slavery in the United States is typically associated with the Caribbean and the Antebellum American South, enslaved people were prevalent throughout New England’s colonial history, and the practice was deeply embedded in the economic and social fabric of the region.[2]

The practice of slavery in Massachusetts was ended gradually, through case law. As an institution, it died out in the late 18th century through judicial actions litigated on behalf of slaves seeking manumission. Following England's lead, Lawyer Benjamin Kent represented slaves in court against their masters as early as 1752. He won the first case to liberate a slave in the United States in 1766. [3][4][5][6][7] The post-revolutionary court cases, starting in 1781, heard arguments contending that slavery was a violation of Christian principles and also a violation of the constitution of the commonwealth. 1783 saw additional high-profile court cases that began a general trend of slaves winning their emancipation on a case-by-case basis through lawsuit. As slavery dwindled in the last decade of the 18th century in Massachusetts, many of the instances where it remained, the slaveholders sometimes applied semantics of a name change to indentured servitude to maintain their property. The 1790 federal census, however, listed no slaves. Massachusetts was a center for the abolition movement in the 19th century. Legislation was passed that abolished slavery with the Thirteenth Amendment in 1865 was ratified by the stateExplanation:

You might be interested in
Critics who point out the presence of U.S. troops in various places around the world claim the nation's foreign policy most refl
zheka24 [161]
The answer is imperialism. Imperialism is <span>a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
How might Claudius agrue that giving citizenship and high office to conquered Gauls would be good for Rome
Eddi Din [679]

Answer:Claudius argued that giving citizen and high office to conquer Gauls would be good for Rome in a way that he viewed empire as citizenship oriented structure were all who wanted cooperate with Rome could be granted citizenship for example he viewed downfall of Athens in a way that Athenians did not wanted to include

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
The migration of America westward is also called...
Maksim231197 [3]

The massive migration and the subsequent rapid settlement of the continental USA were fueled by the Gold Rush, the Oregon Trail (large-wheeled wagon road and emigrant trail in the United States that combined the Missouri River to valleys in Oregon) and a belief in "manifest destiny", the idea that its settlers were designed to expand across North America. This expansion began with the Louisiana Purchase in 1803. The president Thomas Jefferson bought the territory from the French for $15 million, and worked in the creation of an expansionist mentality. As a result this migration is also called Westward Expansion.  

4 0
3 years ago
How did the bill of rights legally change the political system in england​
Allisa [31]

Answer:

Well...It introduced a constitutional monarchy. ... It gave monarchs the right to veto laws. It guaranteed the right to religious equality.

6 0
3 years ago
How did the government justify confiscating Indian lands:​
Korolek [52]

Answer:

It ushered the removal of Indians.

Explanation:

I HOPE THIS HELPS!!!!

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Former South Vietnamese soldiers _____. are well respected in Vietnam
    7·1 answer
  • What happened to the Mongol Empire in the years after Genghis Khan’s death?
    5·1 answer
  • Having property rights refers to the legal authority to do all of the following EXCEPT:
    6·2 answers
  • What was the colonists response on the sugar act
    14·1 answer
  • Congress passed the Interstate Commerce Act (1887) and the Sherman Antitrust Act (1890) in response to
    8·1 answer
  • The sacrifice of Jesus on the cross made the Old Testament sacrifices _______ .
    6·1 answer
  • Which person is credited as being the first individual blogger via his blog, mod.ber?
    11·2 answers
  • HELPPPPPPPPPPPP<br>What affects did Spanish rule have on the people of Mississippi
    7·2 answers
  • How did the Alps influence the development of early Roman civilization
    8·1 answer
  • Why is redistricting important to fair elections
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!