<span>Indirect characterization uses a person/character's speech patterns or other forms of appearance to give a look into their personality. In this case, dialogue would be considered a way to indirectly characterize. Direct characterization, on the other hand, uses actual descriptive words and phrases to give a look at how a character will behave, look, or feel.</span>
Answer:
Answer C is not a rule Ehrenreich made for herself while conducting this research
Explanation:
Number C is simply not part of the four rules she set for herself.
Answer:
The analogy that uses a relationship showing size or degree is Degrees of a Characteristic Analogy.
The analogy that shows relationship between an object and what it is made of is Object and Related Object Analogy.
The analogy that shows "a type of relationship" is Object and part of the whole Analogy
Explanation:
Degrees of a Characteristic Analogy refers to using a relationship between two things showing size or degree example: "warm and hot", "cold and freezing"
Object and Related Object Analogy shows the relationship between an object and what it is made of. Examples include "book and paper".
Object and part of the whole Analogy is the type of analogy that shows a type of relationship that exist between two objects. Examples include "brick and wall", "page and book"
<span>He introduces a major conflict.
Hope this helps!</span>
In the first text, Zimbardo argues that people are neither "good" or "bad." Zimbardo's main claim is that the line between good and evil is movable, and that anyone can cross over under the right circumstances. He tells us that:
"That line between good and evil is permeable. Any of us can move across it....I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil--to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein. It's the situation that brings that out."
Zimbardo argues that people can move across this line due to phenomena such as deindividualization, anonymity of place, dehumanization, role-playing and social modeling, moral disengagement and group conformity.
On the other hand, Nietzsche in "Morality as Anti-Nature" also argues that all men are capable of good and evil, and that evil is therefore a "natural" part of people. However, his opinion is different from Zimbardo in the sense that Nietzsche believes that judging people as "good" and "bad" is pointless because morality is anti-natural, and we have no good reason to believe that our behaviour should be modified to fit these precepts.
