Answer:
I believe it's D. He contrasts the foundry worker's plight to the worker's dream
Answer:
When much oil was discovered in the land of the Nigerian Igbos in 1965, they wanted to rule themselves, and a bloody coup began, starting a war over Biafra, their new country.
Explanation:
The most effective combination of the given sentences is the first one. It's easy to understand and grammatically correct.
The second one is incorrect because the sentences aren't well-connected. We shouldn't use the same conjunction too many times, and here, the conjunction <em>and </em>is repeated.
In the third option, the same issue is present. Besides that, an unnecessary <em>that </em>is used before the phrase<em> much oil,</em> making the sentence additionally difficult to comprehend.
In the fourth option, we have a comma splice - a type of punctuation error, where independent clauses are connected only by a comma. Inserting a conjunction or replacing the comma with a semicolon would correct this mistake.
This is why the first option is the correct one.
What book, movie, play, what are you talking about.
It is destiny that causes him to meet M. Waldman, who develops Victor's passion for the natural sciences of galvanism, electromagnetism, and alchemy. Victor might have been a good mathematician, if he were devoid of passion. But his passion causes him to pursue his dreams and the God-like ideal, and so he seeks intuitively to seek the answers to stopping death through the life sciences.
So yeah the answer would be the D. Waldman.
Answer: D
Explanation: The author feels like "every effort" should be made to pet proof and that "All pet owners should educate themselves". He would definitely not encourage bad pet ownership in this article.
