1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergij07 [2.7K]
3 years ago
8

Cerca del final, Sonny salva a Dr. Calvin en lugar de tomar la decisión racional de "obrar por el bien de todos” Este fue un mom

ento decisivo para Sonny. Explique por qué. ¿Lo hace, el resultado de esta acción, más humano? ¿O lo hace un mejor amigo? ¿No es amistad una característica humana? Explique.​
Social Studies
1 answer:
aniked [119]3 years ago
3 0

Answer

comre estas

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Professor Peterson is a psychology professor who taught his class about theories of emotion. He told his class that facial expre
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Answer:

Facial feedback hypothesis

Explanation:

The facial feedback hypothesis states that facial expressions and movement can influence emotions. This theory states that <u>our facial movements send messages to the brain and this creates a process of feedback in which our brain influences our emotions.</u>

For example, if I fake a smile for some time, my face muscles send this information to the brain and I will end up feeling happy and smiley.

In the question, Professor Petterson is actually teaching his class about how <u>facial expressions provide feedback to the brain which then causes emotions, this is actually what we just explained about the Facial Feedback hypothesis. </u>

7 0
3 years ago
Please write an essay discussing whether and how a) the act of voting is the personal responsibility of every citizen, and b) ci
Delvig [45]

Voting: A Right, A Privilege, or A Responsibility?

When Americans talk about their democracy, they typically emphasize the importance of the right to vote. But the fact is that, unlike other democratic rights protected in the First Amendment, voting rights do not have clear constitutional protections. State legislatures have the right to appoint electors in presidential races without holding elections, for example, and states can enact a variety of policies that directly or indirectly infringe on suffrage rights. While strengthening voting rights in the Constitution would seem like a logical step, there's a potential political barrier: confusion about the meaning of "right."  

This essay invites readers to question whether the ability to vote should be a right, a privilege, or a responsibility. For the ease of readership, I will define the necessary terms:  

  • Privilege (n): An immunity or benefit enjoyed only by a person beyond the advantaged of most.
  • Right (n): That which is due to anyone by just claim, legal guarantees, or moral principles.
  • Responsibility (n): Being answerable or accountable for something within one's power, control, or management.

At first glance, it's easy to view these terms as mutually exclusive. From their definitions, we can see that what is a "privilege" cannot be a right since rights are enjoyed by everyone, while a privilege is reserved for a select group. Likewise, it's impossible for an individual to take on the burden of responsibility if they lack to the right to vote in the first place.

Despite this initial judgment, many people view the ability to vote as all three simultaneously and weigh "right" after "privilege" or "responsibility." For example, many believe the ability to vote is a privilege granted to today's eligible voters by those who fought for it in the past either through war, grassroots movements, or legislative battles. These struggles have kept the United States as an independent nation and granted us the right to vote with the passage of the 15th, 19th, 24th, and 26th amendment, in addition to the legislative victory of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. From this perspective, it is a privilege to live in the United States, standing on the shoulders of these past giants, and we have a responsibility to vote because it honors those who have put their lives on the line to protect it.

Indeed a study conducted in 2006 by Peter D. Hart Research Associates found far most participants in a series of focus groups saw voting as a responsibility or a privilege more than as a right. Many categorized voting primarily as a privilege because previous generations had fought for it and other countries don't enjoy the same freedom. The plurality of participants saw it primarily as a responsibility because it highlights the importance of choosing the government. Many of these participants chose not to classify it primarily as a "right" because the word "right" suggested to them a sense of entitlement.

Many participants also believed that fraud was a bigger problem than disenfranchisement. Although these beliefs are not based in reality (proven cases of voter fraud are miniscule compared to clear cases of denial of suffrage), they say something very important about the general mindset of American voters. When it comes to voting, "right" is a dangerous word since it suggests the ability to vote has simply been given to you without a fight -- and things that can make voting harder but prevent fraud like voter registration laws, requirements for photo identification and inconvenient polling places are minor compared to the sacrifices of past generations. In this mindset, anyone who might not vote due to such barriers is not accepting responsibility for how important it is and not recognizing what a privilege it is to have the right to vote.

As is obvious from the Peter Hart study, a common misconception is the word "right" denoting a sense of entitlement. People who hold this view shy away from considering the ability to vote a right because it suggests it has simply been given to us without historical struggles, thereby demeaning the individuals who have laid their lives on the line to forge and preserve our freedoms.

7 0
3 years ago
2 'While there are people who protest to get their rights back, a large number of
BARSIC [14]

Explanation:

money race power

to steal

to get elected

some undercover police incite violence to entrap

4 0
3 years ago
________ testing uses ambiguous or unstructured testing stimuli to which a person responds freely to the testing stimuli. ______
Nuetrik [128]
Projective testing uses ambiguous or unstructured testing stimuli to which a person responds freely to the testing stimuli. TAT is an example of this type of testing. TAT means Thematic Apperception Test.

The missing words and answers to your posts are B. projective; tat
3 0
4 years ago
Since a person is socialized into roles throughout life, what kinds of things can individuals do to improve this process for the
spin [16.1K]

There are various things people can practice which could positively improve the manner they socialize into various roles in their life. A person is encouraged to always choose to speak the truth and avoid lying to enable him or her build trust with those who are in his/her social circle. Choosing to be honest will make such an individual responsible and moral upright.

As an adult, adopting clear roles such as providing support to younger groups can help in the improvement of life satisfaction,functional health and cognition. For example taking of community tasks can increase social contact and physical activity that will independently boost ones health and well-being in the society. It is advisable that one should study the demographical aspects such as gender and socioeconomic status before adopting a social role


4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What year did Jamaica gain independence?
    10·1 answer
  • From the constructionist perspective, deviants are actively seeking meaning in the deviant activities. totally different from no
    6·1 answer
  • William goes to saddle up stables in the middle of the night when no one is around and takes five saddles. william's crime is
    9·1 answer
  • Which best describes a major difference between latent functions and
    6·1 answer
  • King Louis XIV, Peter the Great, and Suleiman the Magnificent were all considered absolute rulers because they?
    6·1 answer
  • Suppose that only 40% of the U.S. public supported the general direction of the previous U.S. President’s policies. To determine
    6·1 answer
  • When you reflect on stereotypes and how they proliferate in media across the world, think about the access members of minority g
    12·1 answer
  • How has labor laws changed the workplace today?
    7·2 answers
  • SOMEONE PLEASE DO THIS FOR ME. IF I DON'T SUBMIT I WILL FAIL.I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST. NO LINKS.
    15·1 answer
  • "Rights and duties are two sides of the same coin." Explain with examples<br>​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!