This is a legitimate response to an open-ended query of Turkle.
Turkle hopes that by posing these questions, people would think carefully about the fact that many kids and adults would prefer to consult robots and computers about personal or intimate concerns than seek professional guidance from knowledgeable and experienced people who have dealt with situations comparable to their own and have the expertise and experience necessary to provide genuine aid.
Sherry Turkle questions why we would want to talk about love and loss with a machine that doesn't comprehend the course of human existence. Have we really lost faith in our ability to help one another, too?
Learn more about Turkle here:-
brainly.com/question/17518424
#SPJ9
Grilled cheese is the perfect complement to my tomato soup.
<em>Hope this helped! :)</em>
Answer:
The purpose of persuasion in writing is to convince, motivate, or move readers toward a certain point of view, or opinion. The act of trying to persuade automatically implies more than one opinion on the subject can be argued.
The idea of an argument often conjures up images of two people yelling and screaming in anger. In writing, however, an argument is very different. An argument is a reasoned opinion supported and explained by evidence. To argue in writing is to advance knowledge and ideas in a positive way. Written arguments often fail when they employ ranting rather than reasoning.
Most people have strong views on controversial topics (ones that inspire extreme points of view or opinions) and are often very willing to share those strong views. However, imagine you are having a discussion with someone who is only willing to share a particular point of view, ignoring yours, which may be in opposition. The ideas presented by that person would be very narrow, almost as if the person has tunnel vision and is merely expressing a personal opinion. If that person does provide you with facts, they may often be skewed or not from a credible source. After the discussion, there is only a slight chance you would be convinced of the other person’s point of view. You may have new ideas you had not considered before or a new perspective, but you would probably not be thoroughly convinced because that person has not made any attempt to present a well-rounded, fact-based point of view. This is why it is essential for you to not only provide your reader with strong, substantiated evidenced, but also to ensure you present an argument that looks at the topic
Someone who can speak or understand multiple languages
Answer:
C- The water is cold ,but the sand is warm.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
