The issue with democratic systems versus a republic or a constitutional monarchy, whereas there is a Magna Carta, or otherwise any guaranteed protection of the people's rights is that it can be voted away to a majority.
An unelected king that has total control over his subjects with no restraint of power or protection for the people will make none the difference but that in a democracy that person was elected to have total control over his subjects.
The disadvantage, or advantage, of a democracy, is that the majority will always rule over the minority. Regardless of there protected rights.
Answer:
D) must be answered by all societies since they are unavoidable.
Explanation:
Capitalist societies as well as Socialist societies has these three fundamental questions because these three questions are unavoidable and very necessary for the production of goods. If they did not know which product and in what quantity it is produced so they make a great loss. If they produced in large quantity than necessity so they get a great loss while if they produced the product in low amount so there is scarcity of that product in the market. So these question are very important to every society.
Answer:
b. decrease SUV production by 3 million.
Answer:
Just because somebody is opposing to your vews doesn't mean you have to threaten them with violence. you first response to something should not be anger but a way to push your beliefs so others can learn and understand and not be harmed because your emeotions get the best of you.
Explanation:
It was considered sinful to follow Niccolo Machiavelli's advice because it suggested in his book The Prince that future leaders should rule with reason and make choices based on ideas of humanism over religious beliefs. Unfortunately this was still fairly dangerous territory for men to speak of in his time, seeing as the Medici (a wealthy family who ruled through the church) was still in power. Machiavelli suggested that the qualities of a leader were of a kind sort but, when needed, could be the exact opposite. He was the one to propose many of the ideas on politics and philosophy that numerous world leaders use today. Therefore, although his ideals were very realistic, is seemed to cause a wave of trouble within the church. This is why it was considered sinful to follow Machiavelli's advice.
