1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zielflug [23.3K]
3 years ago
10

Explain how natural law allows people of different religions to live together peacefully in society

History
1 answer:
IRINA_888 [86]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:Natural Law allows people to live together peacefully in society. All people have a conscience and recognize the laws built into nature, and these traits are enough to hold a society together. This is how people from other religions can live together peacefully in society.

Explanation: <3

You might be interested in
Brainstorm a list of everything you know about the causes of the civil war
DanielleElmas [232]

Answer:

The Civil War was the culmination of four decades in which deep and entrenched economic, social and political differences were forged between the northern and southern states.

To the conditions of racial difference and slavery in which the South based its economy, which was primarily agricultural (cotton, sugar, rice and tobacco), it opposed the northern manufacturing industry, where the performance was based on the birth of a new class of proletarians, who despite not being slaves, but free citizens, had economic levels that led them to real conditions of slavery.  

In the north, abolitionist groups emerged, which advocated violence as a means to achieve their purposes. In the south there were also groups organized for violence.

Between the years 1845 and 1860, events were happening that, with the help of agitators in both areas, irritated people: the publication of the "Uncle Tom's Cabin" by Harriet Beecher Stowe and its clandestine distribution in the South, the Supreme Court's decision on the Dreed Scott slave trial, the rejection of the pro-slavery Constitution of the future State of Kansas and the prohibition of allowing the concurrence of slaves for the construction of railroads in the territory of Nebraska by southern companies, among others.

This schism was deepened after the creation of the new Republican Party that was integrated by conservatives and dissenting Democrats of the North and South, mainly on issues related to slavery or freedom. This whole problem was also accompanied by growing competition from both regions in international trade, competition encouraged by the protection provided by the United Kingdom to the South, given that the North was a very important competitor for its main manufactured products.

Freeing the slaves, the government, uncompromising diffrences , power of government over the states, economic changes , union was rapidly changing,

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How are natural rights and the nature of government expressed in the Declaration of Independence?
NeTakaya
Thomas Jefferson wrote that Britain was impeding on the colonist’s natural rights even though the role of government is to protect these rights, so therefore it was necessary for the American colonies to gain their independence and form their own separate government and country.
5 0
3 years ago
Why did it seem early in the war that North Korea would win?
miv72 [106K]
Why did it seem early in the war that North Korea would win? ... It wanted to start a war with the United States. It wanted to receive economic aid from the United States. It was influenced by the Soviet Union.
8 0
2 years ago
why did the federalists believe that the constitution would prevent the national government from gaining too much power
vfiekz [6]
The government was divided into three branches, judicial, legislative, and executive.  The federalist believed that the national government should take care of everything and have the ultimate authority, but the constitution limited what the branches could do, therefore, the federalist believed that the constitution gave the national government too much power. The Anti-Federalist argued that the constitution gave too much power to the federal government. The Federalist believed that the nation might not survive without the passing of the constitution, and that a stronger national government was necessary after the Articles of Confederation failed. 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was Francisco Franco?
Juli2301 [7.4K]
He was an Espanol general that led the rebels (Spanish Civil war) from 1936 - 1939. He was typically against the left wings Republican Parliament.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the trail of tears
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following WAS NOT a Great Society program?
    10·1 answer
  • Four basic causes of the Civil War
    8·1 answer
  • What were two results of Doolittle’s raid on Japan in April 1942?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of these contributes most to political divisions in the middle east?
    8·1 answer
  • Why is the munich conference and appeasement a turning point in preventing war in europe ?
    7·1 answer
  • Every decision you make is an economic decision because you're choosing how to use your
    14·2 answers
  • Name five native american tribes that lived in california before the first settlers arrived.
    6·1 answer
  • The observations of Galileo supported the work of which of the following: A) Andreas Vesalius B) Urban VIII C) Urban VIII D) Cop
    9·1 answer
  • Which Indigenous group developed a technique called dry farming that relied on irrigation to grow corn and other vegetables?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!