Answer is -<span>The magna carta gave them direction, so they probably wouldn't know what to do</span>
Answer:
no idea sorry
Explanation:
luWQEkuywrwgwd3kyurtg3wkyrau3wrtak3vyrtgk3yrugx3ryutagv3kwy3trgv3wyrvgkw3aytyt3rktvw3afytv3cytvakryw3cv3tryvw3cryw3tvryckt3vyakv3r
c3wr
aw3rcw3raw3
rw3raw3raw3raw3raw3
craw3rcaw3r
3wraw3raw3r
wa3raw3raw
3raw3rcwrcwawrwr
Antifederalist saw the Constitution as a way for the Federalist to gain more control over the states. This was seen as the opposite for the Federalist Party because they just wanted to create a central government that was strong enough to run the whole country. The Antifederalist Party was totally against the ratification because they were afraid that the national government would become too powerful and take advantage of their power. The Federalist Party was for the Constitution because they saw it as a way for the people to get more involved in the government since the most powerful branch would be directly linked to the people. Lastly, the Antifederalists saw the Constitution as a way to take the power of the states away while the Federalists interpreted the Constitution as a way for the states and the national government to have similar powers that still allow the national government to handle national affairs rather than having the states do it.
Acquiring colonies to provide a favorable balance of trade.
Mercantilism was the theory that trade generates wealth and peer, so gathering colonies that stimulate trade would fall under mercantilism.
It was Spain,France,And the U.S
