Warsaw Pact members in <u>1955</u> = Soviet Union and Albania, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Hungary, Poland, Romania.
<em>I'm assuming you meant 1955 rather than 1995, because the Warsaw Pact no longer existed by 1995. It was formally disbanded in 1991.</em>
<u>Detail</u>:
The Warsaw Pact was given that name because the agreement was signed in Warsaw, Poland. Established in 1955, the Warsaw Pact included the Soviet Union and Albania, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Hungary, Poland, Romania. The nations signing the treaty called on each other to defend of any member of the Pact that was threatened by enemy forces. The formation of the Warsaw Pact was in direct response to the formation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
In 1958, Hungary tried to withdraw from the Warsaw Pact, but Soviet troops came in and crushed the movement in Hungary and replaced the government.
Albania withdrew from the Warsaw Pact in 1968, after relations between Albania and the USSR had split beginning in 1961.
The Warsaw Pact formally dissolved in 1991, following the overthrow of communist governments in Eastern Europe and while the USSR itself was proceeding toward its own dissolution later that year.
D) Campaign contributions.
The question pertains to selecting heads of departments in government positions. Relying on campaign contributions as a factor would essentially mean individuals were buying their way into government positions.
Obviously abilities and professional experience matter the most. Ethnicity ought not be a consideration in a prejudicial manner. But if government agencies are going to represent well the various constituencies of the American public, those making government appointments will take care to consider qualified minority candidates to serve as department heads.
1 "Determining the author's point of view on the subject" can help historians to decide whether the source is reliable or not. It shows the background of author, place and time in which he live.It clearly shows whether the author is influenced by any particular ideology and interests or not and whether the author is biased or not. Historians like Mortan define point of view " as attempting to see through the eyes of the people who lived in times and circumstances far removed from our present day lives".
2 A notification book written by an expert on the USS Maine is best choice as a source of information for Pillar for doing his research as it can provide him authentic and detailed information regarding the event. He can also use historical novel but with care and after cross-checking from other sources.
3 It could help them develop a better understanding of past idea.
4 The primarily finds out the truth about the events from the past. They use various kinds of sources like literary and archaeological and cross-check them in order to find the truth about the event. Besides they interpret the events and make the facts to speak which ultimately help us to know the reality of the past.
5. After USS Maine sank, yellow journalists exaggerated the truth about the event. They began to distort facts and spread warmongering which ended in American-Spanish war. They published fake articles about a plot to sink the ship and Remember the Maine became a battle cry which increased the tensions between the two. The two main yellow journalists Joseph Pultizar and Wiliam Randolph were in the forefront in this propaganda.
Answer: A) natural disasters that affect refineries, B) greater demand for oil, and C) war and terrorism.
Explanation:
According to the unit, the three things that affect oil prices today are natural disasters that affect refineries, greater demand for oil, and war and terrorism.
Hope this helps :)
