The characteristics of modern society that lower people's quality of life are; Stigmatisation and Mindless conformity.
<h3>What are some characteristics of modern society that lower people's quality of life?</h3>
Such negative character traits have been identified to lower people's quality of life and examples include Stigmatisation and Mindless conformity. Stigmatisation occurs when the society tags one as the odd one out while mindless conformity involves the society expecting one to do as the society does.
Read more on quality of life;
brainly.com/question/12790680
#SPJ1
I would say the answer is A
ANSWER: B. Landowners are forced to give up ownership of their land or be killed.
EXPLANATION: Colonies were setup to grab the resources of the colonized people. Wherever a country has tried to setup their colony, the colonized people have suffered a lot. Looting were a common phenomenon. Similarly, they needed lands for which landowners were threatened to leave their lands or get killed.
He missed the sights, smells and sounds of his own neighborhood.
<u>Explanation</u>:
- Colin had travelled a half-way around the world and he didn't have a hard time. He had been wondering who might he would become after those travels.
- But he longed for his home, his real home in England. He missed his friends, sights, smells and sounds of his neighborhood. Before the thought of joining the conversation with the guide,he thought of this in his mind.
Answer and Explanation:
This question is asking for a personal opinion. Consider the following answer an example, and feel free to change and adapt it to your own point of view:
When people hear perspectives that are hurtful to themselves or to others, they have, in my opinion, two options. They can either choose to ignore them or to argue against them. Some things must be taken into consideration when deciding which way to go, though. The person who is thinking of arguing may ask him/herself whether this discussion is worth the time and effort. They may consider their audience - perhaps the person who voiced the hurtful perspectives in the first place is rude, aggressive, even violent. In that case, it may very well be better to just let go, to just find a better place - and a better audience - to comment and discuss that matter.
If, however, he or she decides to argue - if the audience is open to it, if he or she feels it is worth their time and effort- , he or she must do so with confidence and patience. No hurtful perspective is worth getting angry over. As a matter of fact, once someone displays anger, he or she loses face.
