Answer:
A united nation with slavery abolished
Why?
We can easily take out,two nations, one with slavery and one without, and, a united nation with slavery only in the South. This is because after the civil war there was no slavery as it abolished. We can eliminate,a united nation with a new system of government, because our government did not change, only the laws. This being, a united nation with slavery abolished, is the answer because our nation was one united again and slavery was abolished.
Anti-Federalism refers to a movement that opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal government. Therefor, they most likely agree that the Constitution needs to be changed to include a bill of rights.
Answer:
The structure of Congress under the Articles of Confederation was unicameral: each state had between two and seven congressmen, depending on state's population, and was appointed directly by each state legislature.
This structure favored the most populated states such as Pennsylvania over the least populated, because the more populated a state, the more delegates it could send to Congress.
When the US Constitution was ratified, Congress became bicameral mainly for two reasons:
- To give both the most populated states and the least populated states fair representation. This was achieved by implementing the Connecticut Compromise: The Senate was meant to equally favor each state, regarless of population, thus, each state was entitled to two senators. And The House was designed to favor the most populated states: House representatives are proportional to population.
- To further the development of checks and balances. A unicameral Congress is more powerful than a bicameral Congress. Both House and the Senate have some specific powers, but for most issues, they have to work together. This avoids concentration of power.
These two points can be thought of as the advantages the US Congress under the current constitution has over the previous Congress under the Articles of Confederation.
The standard account of American immigration focuses on the acculturation and assimilation of immigrants and their children to American society. This analysis typically ignores the significant contributions of immigrants to the creation of American culture through the performing arts, sciences, and other cultural pursuits. Immigrants and their children are not born with more creative talents than native-born citizens, but their selectivity and marginality may have pushed and pulled those with ability into high-risk career paths that reward creative work. The presence of large numbers of talented immigrants in Hollywood, academia, and the high-tech industries has pushed American institutions to be more meritocratic and open to innovation than they would be otherwise.
plz mark me as brainliest fi this helped :)
