First off, this isn't really a yes or no question, this is an opinion.
My opinion is that photos that have been altered in any way should be marked. These days you never know what a person will do to say, get a job, advance a political agenda, or ruin the reputation of another person. The public has the right to the truth. Therefore, altered pictures should be marked or labeled in a way that differentiates them from others.
Answer:
By modern standards, nineteenth-century photography can appear rather primitive. While the stark black and white landscapes and unsmiling people have their own austere beauty, these images also challenge our notions of what defines a work of art.
Photography is a controversial fine art medium, simply because it is difficult to classify—is it an art or a science? Nineteenth century photographers struggled with this distinction, trying to reconcile aesthetics with improvements in technology.
Explanation:
Answer:
The abandonment of the law school, the rejection at the Academy of Fine Arts in Munich and the visit to the Monet exhibition.
Explanation:
Kandinsky is considered the father of abstract art. His work is extremely influential worldwide, being considered one of the greatest Russian artists that has ever existed.
In 1896, Kandinsky went through several events that shaped his perception of himself, life and art. That year, he dropped out of law school because he felt that this was not the right career for him, and enrolled at the Munich Academy of Fine Arts, however, he did not pass the admission exam, which made him question his choices and his artistic talents. After reflecting, he started taking classes on his own and had proof that he wanted to be an artist by watching an exhibition of Monet's works.
I would say d. Businesses use video production or commercials to advertise and sell goods and services.
