Answer:
The element that would follow this statement is "text evidence from Niemand's argument"
Explanation:
The question is not complete since it does not provide the complete information, here is the complete information:
Read this passage from Giovanna's evaluation of an argument claiming that climate change is not affected by human
activity.
Niemand's article on climate change in the editorial section of today's newspaper offers a weak argument. His reasoning
consists of little more than unsubstantiated assertions that climate change is not affected by human activity.
In an effective evaluation, which element would follow this statement?
a. a summary of Niemand's claim
b. text evidence from Niemand's argument
c. a restatement of Giovanna's evaluation
d. the name and source of Niemand's article
The process of making an evaluation of an argument as Giovanna is doing with this lines has to support the idea with reliable evidence as to the next part of the information, this makes option B the best answer to describe what is the next step for Giovanna's evaluation as she will present the evidence to deny the counterclaims.
C, sh wants to fool Lillian Jean into trusting her
I would go with C. Because the narrator is talking. The narrator want to have a lesson badly on water-reading. But Mr. Bixby thinks the narrator is far to advanced for it and will not teach her it. So Mr. Bixby is being stubborn and will not give the lesson.
1. juliet
2.juliet
3.nurse
4.juliet
5.nurse
6.nurse
hope i helped - beanz
<span>According to ideas in Walden, I suggest you to go with this one: C) He would believe they were destructive to a person’s thinking ability. It's the closest one from options given above.</span>
