When Katie decides to take $25,000 in December (the normal payable date) and to defer the residual for 15 years when she plans to retire. "She does not violate the economic benefit rule with the decision."
<h3>What is Economic Benefit Rule?</h3>
It is a principle of taxation that affects taxpayers with cash basis who are paid for their services.
According to its provisions, a taxpayer is subject to taxation if they derive a "economic benefit" from an unqualified right to acquire property in the future.
Some examples of economic benefit rule are-
- net income and revenues,
- profit and net cash flow,
- a decrease in anything, such a cost,
- cheaper labour or raw material costs.
Thus, the benefit a person receives from paying less for a good than the utmost price they are willing to pay for it is known as the net economic benefit.
To know more about the principle of taxation, here
brainly.com/question/988284
#SPJ4
Answer:
A) The price of a donut is $2.00 in 2009.
B) Rina's wage is $14.00 per hour in 2009.
Explanation:
The nominal value of a variable is its monetary amount, in this case, in dollars which is susceptible to currency fluctuations and inflation. Therefore, statements A and B present the nominal value of a variable.
When valuing a variable as an exchange for another good, that is assigning a real value to that variable since monetary changes won't affect the relationship between two goods.
The answers are A) and B)
Explanation:
A. The elements are:
-The person must have committed an act that is prohibited
-The act must have been committed with intent
B
The defenses include
-Self defense
- under duress
- insanity
- necessity
C officer john law had a good and enough cause to search Jake and seize his firearm since his movement was suspicious. It was midnight and he was about a shop in a strange manner and he was even talking to someone else. Such actions is enough to get an officer at alert. It seemed like jake and the man were planning on how to commit a crime. A search on the man even revealed a weapon. 4th amendment gives a protection to peoples privacy and immunity from unnecessary search and seizures. But the amendment does not say a probable cause like the officer had done was illegal. This search was reasonable and very legal. Jakes rights were not violated.
Answer:
D) The husband could not make any type of contribution, whereas the wife could make a tax deductible contribution.
Explanation:
The husband is already participating in his employer's pension plan, so he cannot make tax deductible contributions to an IRA account. On the other hand, the wife is allowed to make tax deductible contributions herself. The husband would have to make after tax contributions similar to a Roth IRA account.
Answer:
I think the correct answer is SOFIA
Explanation:
BECAUSE Thomas's and AARON'S investment is a long term investment