Answer:
C
Explanation:
After the war ended, Germany was blamed, despite the fact that it was Austro-Hungary that started the War. The treaty prevented the German government from having an airforce or navy, and severely limited the German Army. Because of this humiliation, this would be used as a pretext for Adolf Hitler.
Answer:
Elections will do more harm than good
Explanation:
Election will do more harm than good. Hope this helps! :)
(If it does, can you give this answer brainliest :P)
It would be "psychology" and "philosophy" and "psychology" that have Greek origins, although it should be noted that several sub-disciplines of these forms have other origins.
Answer:11.Analyzing Primary Sources What reasons are given for the issuing of this edict? The reasons for issuing the Edict of Milan was that so people are treated equally, and that since people are allowed to believe in their own religion, they believed that Christians should be allowed to believe in their own religion.12.Drawing Conclusions Why do you think property was restored to the Christians and to their churches?Property was restored to the Christians and their churches because they previously own that land, but was persecuted and forced out of that area, taking away any property that belong to them.13.Identifying Perspectives, The Edict of Milan only guarantees tolerance of Christianity, not recognition by the state. Why did Constantine and Licinius take this position?The reason why Constantine and Licinius took the position to tolerate Christians is because it was unfair for people who believe in Christianity to be treated differently from their religion when they allow people to practicetheir own.14.ComparingHow does the edict’s position on religion compare with a political ideal or contemporary event?The edict’s position on religion compares with a political ideal because many politicians speak about freedom of religion and worship and allows people to pursue their own.
Explanation:because i said
There were a number of reasons Federalists opposed the Louisiana Purchase. One can assume some opposed it just because it was Jefferson who made the purchase, out of a kind of reflex. Others had heard wild stories about the land purchased, and thought the purchase a bad bargain. Some thought that the inclusion of Louisiana as the treaty was written would undercut the power of the states by not having each state vote, thus undercutting Federalist power. (Some Federalists in the eastern states specifically feared a shift in power to the west.)
http://www.enotes.com/homework-help/why-did-some-federalists-oppose-louisiana-purchase-21441
Comments if you have any questions. :)
