Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
A basic premise of the framework is that incidents are generally handled at the lowest jurisdictional level possible. The National response protocols recognize this and are structured to provide additional tiered levels of support when there is need.
Buck utilized System 2 of his cerebrum to figure his exercise plan, yet then surrendered to System 1 when he chose to sleep in.
System 1 and System 2 are two particular methods of decision making: System 1 is a programmed, quick and regularly oblivious state of mind. It is self-governing and productive, requiring little vitality or consideration yet is inclined to biases and methodical blunders. System 2 is an effortful, moderate and controlled way of thinking. Which explains why Buck chose to sleep :)
Im pretty sure the answer is c if not then b
Answer:
The correct answer for: Risk of harm in social and behavioral sciences generally fall in three categories, which are: Is: 1.- Invasion of privacy. 2.- Breach of confidentiality. 3.- Study procedure.
Explanation:
First of all risk of harm in social and behavioral sciences is a very general phenomenon that is part of the interdisciplinary objects o studies because it has many causes and many perspectives to be analyzed. It is such a complex phenomenon that can be analyzed by many postures and it has so many outcomes also that there has to be an event with the isolation of events or parts to be discussed, analyzed, and solved. Thus, invasion o privacy it's a very basic form in which this phenomenon can be caused or developed. Breach confidentiality also has a very close relation with le last mentioned because the exposure of information after it's gathering will lead to scenarios in which there could be a risk the subjects of study or the researchers can make the study all into this category. Now the last want is a bit complicated because even though it can define the procedure of study it also can be the same effect by revealing this information to the public.
<u>Answer:</u>
Telemarketers know that anyone who agrees to listen to a pitch is more likely to buy the product, thanks to the foot-in-the-door phenomenon.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- 'Foot-in-the-door phenomenon' is the phenomenon of persuading someone to agree upon a big request after them 'agreeing to a small request'.
- This phenomenon is based on a principle that when a person agrees upon a small request, there is development of bond between the requester and request.
- This development of bond will help the requester to make request agree upon his request.
- In the above case, if a person agrees to listen to the polite pitches of telemarketers, there is agreement on small request and the probability to buy a product will increase because there is development of bond between them.
