1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
igor_vitrenko [27]
3 years ago
12

What were two results of the decline of the Roman Empire?

History
1 answer:
salantis [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Read below

Explanation:

1: Barbarians kept on attacking

2: Internal stability like the killing of Julis Ceaser

3: Ethnic groups inside the Roman Empire that wanted to be free

4: People were hungry for power

5: Failing economic system

6: The Roman Empire being split in two

7: Some people didn't want to change there religion

8: Rise Of Islam ( later years )

9: Different cultures

You might be interested in
Rebellious son of the emperor Aurangzeb​
matrenka [14]

Answer:

Jalaluddin Muhammed Akbar (11 September 1657 – 31 March 1706) was a Mughal prince and the youngest son of Emperor Aurangzeb and his chief consort Dilras Banu Begum. Akbar led a rebellion against his father and fled the Deccan after the failure of that venture. He later went into exile to Persia, where he died.

Explanation:

I hope it's help u

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In which section of the Declaration of Independence Is the purpose of government described
Luden [163]
The introduction or "Preamble" if you will.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was one requirement of President Lincoln’s plan for Reconstruction?
yanalaym [24]

Answer:

C. All southern states had to abolish the practice of slavery

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help I’ll do 13 points
aivan3 [116]

Answer: Tenements

Explanation: I searched the definition of each one up.

7 0
2 years ago
In a least 150 words answer the following question. Which of the three economic systems (market, planned, and mixed) do you beli
sdas [7]
Scarcity is the fundamental challenge that all individuals and nations must confront. Everyone faces some limitations, so we all have to make choices where we limit or allow ourselves to something.

Economists generally recognize four types of economic systems traditional, traditional, command, market and mixed.

A traditional economic system is shaped by tradition. The work that people do, the goods and services they provide, how they exchange resources… all tend to follow a pattern. The traditional system is bad at addressing scarcity because scarcity is formed off of new requirements people have through the ages and a traditional system would not evolve just as our requirements would.

In a planned economy, the government controls the economy. The state decides how to use and distribute resources. The government regulates prices and wages; it may even determine what sorts of work individuals do.
Socialism is a prime example of a planned economy. Socialism does not work because it is not consistent with the fundamental principles of human behavior. The failure of socialism in countries around the world can be traced to one critical defect: it is a system that ignores incentives.

Market economies allow all economic decisions to be made by individuals. The unrestrained interactions between individuals and companies in the marketplace determine what happens to all the good and resources.Individuals choose how to invest their personal resources and individuals decide what to consume. Within a pure market economy,  the government is entirely absent from economic affairs.

A mixed economic system combines elements of the market and command economy. Many economic decisions are made in the market by individuals. But the government also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources.

If scarcity is looked at on a macro level, the best economic system is mixed because it allows the government to also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources, while the individuals still stay happy because they have some control. The only problem is the eternal question of what the right mix between the public and private sectors of the economy should be.

There is no point to look at it on a micro level because almost no country is small enough to be considered on that level.


6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Tell me some stuff about Constantine's military career
    12·1 answer
  • Why are many of the countries of southeastern Europe struggling for economic success?
    13·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP!! DUE IN 2 HOURS WILL MARKS AS BRAINLIEST!!
    11·2 answers
  • 1. Pedro needs to do his chores but keeps procrastinating. What advice could you give him? (1 point)
    6·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the suffrage movement in the mid to late 1800s
    8·1 answer
  • Which of these best describes a civil liberty
    11·1 answer
  • if a block is already put in motion, which of the following statements apply? the force needed to overcome the sliding friction
    5·1 answer
  • Why are private companies unlikely to provide public goods?
    5·1 answer
  • whats in the blank help fast • Turmoil within Rome's ________ proved to be more dangerous to the Republic's stability.
    12·1 answer
  • When will a fossil be used in finding the absolute age of rocks?(1 point)
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!