Answer:
You need to explain the five sensors of the phrase surrounded in speech marks.
Explanation:
The five sensors are sight, sound, taste, touch and smell.
So for example, you could write:
Sight : "I could see him hold his gun, his fingers ready to pull the trigger."
Sound: "I could hear Johnny reloading his gun."
Taste: "I could taste the metallic smell of the bullet as it made its way, destroying walls and leaving a perfect sphere-like mark."
Touch: "I held the gun. It was heavy, metallic and quite firm." < This is in Johnny's perspective.
Smell: "Johnny had pulled the trigger. Smoke had made its way into the air, as it slowly disappears, releasing a painful smell to my nostrils."
I apologise if this wasn't the help you were looking for. But it was worth a shot. I hope this helped.
Stay safe!
(Please mark this as brainliest if it did help!)
Answer:
i- dude what happened like
Answer: sounds like daddy issues to me
Explanation:
The choice of Willa Cather to state A Wagner Matinee according to Clark's perspective implied that the perusers know just everything Clark says to them and have their viewpoint molded by his.
<h3>How does the choice by Willa Cather respond?</h3>
Recorded as a hard copy the book according to the perspective of Clark, an individual who peruses the work may have the option to follow the story through his eyes.
This implies that the peruser will just know what Clark knows, and structure an assessment in view of Clark's viewpoints. Willa Cather's choice to wright.
A Wagner Matinee according to Clark's perspective means the perusers need to pick whether to accept Clark's side of the story and Georgina's side.
For more information about Wagner Matinee, refer the following link:
brainly.com/question/26305422
Answer:
Grant political asylum
This is in response to the news titled “Rizal yet to get travel documents” dated March 17. It is unfortunate that Tek Nath Rizal, known as the father of the Bhutanese democracy movement, could not go to Geneva to attend the UN Commission for Human Rights meeting as the Nepal government could not provide him with necessary travel documents. He and two other Bhutanese human rights activists were invited by Lutheran World Federation. Nepal has not granted him political asylum till date for which he had applied in October last year. It sounds mysterious why Nepal deliberately fails to do so if it sincerely wants to solve the long protracted crisis. Granting Rizal the refugee status and travel document would not add any extra burden for Nepal, rather it would unleash Nepal from the burden of raising their concerns in the international arena. Who else could present the concerns and problems of the refugees better than Rizal?
