What was NOT part of the Intolerable Acts?

History

1 answer:

noname [10]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

D | The option 'put a higher tax on sugar' was not part of the Intolerable Acts.

Explanation:

The Intolerable Acts was not included with the Sugar Act.

Therefore, the Sugar Act put a higher tax on sugar while the Intolerable Acts did not.

You might be interested in

What led to senator mccarthy's downfall?

sweet-ann [11.9K]

Ultimately, Joe McCarthy was using weak evidence to accuse people of being communist. Through his televised questioning of the army, many of whom were war heroes, the public saw the mean-spiritedness of McCarthy’s campaign. Polls showed the American people thought McCarthy devious in his attack of the army. Fed up, McCarthy’s colleagues censured him for dishonoring the Senate, and the hearings came to a close.

this is the correct answer.....

3 0

3 years ago

What did Henry Ford develop? A. mass production of guns B. the automobile C. the internal combustion engine D. mass production o

Ilya [14]

E: both B and D. The automobile and the mass assembly line

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Compare and contrast the regional cultures and economies of the English, French, and Spanish areas of control in the Americas. H

Dennis_Churaev [7]

British Colonies in the Americas were established by royal charter. French colonies started as fur trading posts and then developed later to common colonies. Spanish colonies were crown-sponsored conquests to find riches such as gold and silver.

The British colonies had population mostly from colonists that were recruited among middle-class farmers, servants, and convicted criminals. French colonies population were initially traders, merchants and missionaries, later some soldiers were given land there. Spanish colonies population consisted of conquerors, soldiers and missionaries.

The economy from each colony was different, in the British colony the economy was diverse and included mostly farming, fishing and trading products like tobacco, rice, timber, and fish. The French colony economy like said before, was established over fur trade and some plantations on the Mississippi valley. The Spanish colonies economy was a trading economy that consisted of farming but it was heavily regulated by the Spanish crown.

The British colony started with a friendly relationship with the Native Americans, eventually, things changed when they needed to get new land. The French colony relationship with Native Americans was good, they respected them and forged alliances. Spanish colony relationship with Native Americans was bad when they were not killed by soldiers, they were subjugated or converted to Christianity.

5 0

3 years ago

Why do most of the immigrants settle in large cities?

777dan777 [17]

Answer:

so They could find work

7 0

3 years ago

Why didn't early Portuguese and Dutch explorers decide to create settlements in Australia? A. They didn't think the land was sui

kirza4 [7]

B. Local natives successfully defeated Dutch and Portuguese forces.

5 0

3 years ago