I am not absolutely sure but i believe the answer is true
<span />
Answer:
This is an example of status quo pricing.
Explanation:
Status quo refers to <em>following an already established and existing way</em> of something. It is mostly regarding social norms.
Satus quo pricing is a strategy used by companies in which one <em>copies or maintains similar price levels</em> as the market or as the company's competitors. It is a strategy used generally when the companies don't want to move things around, maintaining the industry's status quo.
You can distinguish between correlation and causation and eliminate confounding variables by using random assignment. Experiments often create contrasts between a control group and one or more treatment groups as a crucial part of the scientific method.
<h3>When is random assignment appropriate in an experiment?</h3>
In general, whenever it is ethically feasible and appropriate for your research topic, random assignment should always be used in trials. Both random sampling and random assignment are crucial ideas in research, but it's critical to recognize their distinctions.
<h3>Is it moral to choose participants for an experiment at random?</h3>
Random assignment cannot be used to evaluate risky or unhealthy behaviour. For instance, it would be unethical to assign volunteers at random to one of the two groups and urge them to consume huge amounts of alcohol as part of an experiment on heavy drinkers versus social drinkers.
Learn more about Completely randomized design:
brainly.com/question/20595336
#SPJ4
Answer:
Social Darwinism would affect American Political thought because it is an ideology that justifies racism, discrimination, and promotes eugenesia, based on the application of the ideas of Darwin to a social context.
That is to say, Social Darwinism is the belief that some people or some groups of people are inherently superior to others, and as such, they deserve to be on top of society, and to override the desires or priorities of people or groups of people deemed to be inferior.
Answer:
His personality, the situation
Explanation:
<em>According to the ultimate attribution error, if an observer thought a harm-doer was black, they would be more likely to attribute his action to his personality. If an observer thought he was white, they would be more willing to attribute his action to the situation.</em>
Because, of the double standard created by the prejudice.
