I would say A or C but I would go with A and if not go with C but I'm
NOT a 100% sure.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
While some contributions may feel familiar, others are genuinely surprising: It turns out the society was responsible for early versions of everything from air conditioning to home security. “There is no doubt that Ancient Egyptian inventions have had an immeasurable impact on the modern world,”
The statement about how Karl Marx and Adam Smith are different would be:
Adam Smith and Karl Marx are polar opposites in the political-economic, in such that Smith would in no way agree<span> with a revolution of the proletariat.
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
</span>
Answer:
A. Individual rights would be threatened by the creation of a stronger federal government.
Explanation:
The main argument used by Anti-Federalists in debates over ratification of the U.S. Constitution is that "Individual rights would be threatened by the creation of a stronger federal government."
This is evident as they eventually asked for the establishment of a Bill of Rights to serves as a means of protecting the Individual and states rights that may be threatened by the creation of a stronger federal government.
Because Austria's army in 1788 was not one single and unified fighting force. Rather, Austria's army (Which at the time was not called Austria but the Habsburg Empire) was composed of squads from many smaller nations that were found in the Habsburg Empire. Because there were strong nationalist tendencies among these, they spoke differently and this eventually lead to big differences among different groups and attacks between each other.
