1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Evgen [1.6K]
3 years ago
13

How did Senator McCarthy make the Red Scare worse?

History
1 answer:
valina [46]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: brainliest must

hope you like it

Explanation:

In the early 1950s, American leaders repeatedly told the public that they should be fearful of subversive Communist influence in their lives. Communists could be lurking anywhere, using their positions as school teachers, college professors, labor organizers, artists, or journalists to aid the program of world Communist domination. This paranoia about the internal Communist threat—what we call the Red Scare—reached a fever pitch between 1950 and 1954, when Senator Joe McCarthy of Wisconsin, a right-wing Republican, launched a series of highly publicized probes into alleged Communist penetration of the State Department, the White House, the Treasury, and even the US Army. During Eisenhower’s first two years in office, McCarthy’s shrieking denunciations and fear-mongering created a climate of fear and suspicion across the country. No one dared tangle with McCarthy for fear of being labeled disloyal.

"Any man who has been named by a either a senator or a committee or a congressman as dangerous to the welfare of this nation, his name should be submitted to the various intelligence units, and they should conduct a complete check upon him. It’s not too much to ask."

Senator Joseph McCarthy, 1953

You might be interested in
How did a religious tolerance across the muslim empires help increase interconnectedness in afro eurasia?????​
olchik [2.2K]
I really don’t know that’s hard
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the Texas cities of Houston, Corpus Christi, and Beaumont have in COMMON?
vlada-n [284]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP HISTORY! MARKING BRAINIEST
poizon [28]

Answer:

The global equilibrium, which had allowed the United States to grow and prosper in virtual isolation since 1815 was gone forever as the result of a short but shattering war. In 1898, U.S. domestic support for the independence of Cuba enmeshed the United States in a struggle with Spain over the fate of the island nation. The decision to aid the Cuban resistance was a major departure from the traditional American practice of liberal nationalism, and the results of that decision had far-reaching consequences. The 1898 Treaty of Paris ending the war gave Cuba its independence and also ceded important Spanish possessions to the United States—notably Puerto Rico, the Philippines, and the small island of Guam. The United States was suddenly a colonial power with overseas dependencies. This assumption of colonial responsibilities reflected not only the temporary enthusiasms of 1898 but also marked a profound change in the diplomatic posture of the United States. The foreign policies of the early 19th century had less relevance at the dawn of the 20th century because the nation had changed. The United States had almost all the attributes of a great power—it stood ahead or nearly ahead of almost all other countries in terms of population, geographic size and location on two oceans, economic resources, and military potential.Foreign policy had to change to meet these new circumstances. President William McKinley drew attention to the new situation in the instructions he gave to the delegation of American statesmen who negotiated the Treaty of Paris. “We cannot be unmindful that without any desire or design on our part the war has brought us new duties and responsibilities which we must meet and discharge as becomes a great nation on whose growth and career from the beginning the Ruler of Nations has plainly written the high command and pledge of civilization.” Another contemporary observer, George L. Rives, extended this interpretation. “Whether we like it or not,” he wrote, “it is plain that the country is now entering into a period in its history in which it will necessarily be brought into far closer and more complex relations with all the other great Powers of the world,” an outcome that would leave established foreign policy outmoded. “We shall now and henceforth be looked upon as having cast aside our traditional attitude of isolation.”

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
When American troops entered the Vietnam War, many Americans​
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:Fighting resumed and South Vietnam eventually surrendered to the forces of North Vietnam in April 1975. Approximately 2,700,000 American men and women served in Vietnam. It was the first war in which the US failed to meet its objectives. It was also the first time America failed to welcome its veterans back as heroes.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
He main goal of using a cost-benefit analysis is to reach a
Marizza181 [45]

The main goal of using a cost-benefit analysis is to reach a decision.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If a newly elected president can not take office does the old president stay in power for four more years
    9·1 answer
  • Why did turman decide to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima
    5·2 answers
  • Why is Cuba’s location strategic to the area
    12·2 answers
  • What did Jefferson think about Hamilton?
    15·1 answer
  • Which is an example of a financial change that would require budgetary consideration?
    7·2 answers
  • Which statement is the best conclusion that can be drawn from the map?
    14·1 answer
  • What political party developed as a result of the Kansas-Nebraska Act?
    10·1 answer
  • Why was the capture of Vicksburg important?
    12·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELPPPP!!!
    12·1 answer
  • How did Americans support the government financially?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!