The phrase that identifies a cultural aspect is "and every dish was commended, first by him and then by Sir William"
<h3>How to identify the cultural aspect of the fragment?</h3>
To identify the cultural aspect of the fragment we must follow the following steps:
- Identify the context of the text.
- Read the excerpt carefully.
- Take into account the most relevant details.
- Identify sentences that refer to the cultural aspect.
According to the above, it can be inferred that the sentence that refers to a cultural aspect is:
- "and every dish was commended, first by him and then by Sir William"
This sentence refers to a cultural aspect because the context of the fragment is in England and the people of this country are usually very courteous and have very strict manners.
Additionally, this sentence describes a situation that denotes pre-established social and cultural relations between those present at the dinner.
Learn more about cultural aspects in: brainly.com/question/5592230
#SPJ1
Few people doubted his legitimacy. Legitimacy in this issue isn't characterized by the mainstream vote, vote tallies, our outrage or individuals quibbling about how the procedure turned out badly. It's characterized by a legitimate procedure that — regardless of the possibility that we contend about regardless of whether the Supreme Court settled on the morally remedy choice—was lawful and inside their domain. He promised of office, the Congress and Executive branch perceived that and hence he was the true blue POTUS. Suppositions on this issue are as unessential as sentiments on the presence of gravity.
The Gullah people in South Carolina and Georgia are most known for their rich African culture and language which distinguish them from other African Americans. They have their own creole language, the Gullah language. Their development of a creole culture have helped them conserve much of their linguistic and cultural heritage.
The arrest of a criminal suspect.
If you've ever watched a television crime drama, you've heard the "Miranda warning" -- or at least the beginning of it: "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney ...." There's a couple more sentences to the warning, but TV shows often cut to the next scene before hearing the arresting officer finish their recitation of the full warning.
Miranda v. Arizona was a Supreme Court case decided in 1966. Ernesto Miranda was accused of kidnapping and raping a woman. He confessed to the crime when interrogated by police, but attorneys argued that he did not fully understand his 6th Amendment rights. After the decision in Miranda v. Arizona, it has become standard procedure in all arrests that the arresting officers must clearly state the accused person's rights -- their "Miranda rights," as they have become known.
