Chinese merchants would trade with Africa to obtain salt. They can offer silk, paper and gunpowder in exchange for the salt.
Trade resulted in sharing of goods and ideas with different cultures and people across the world. Medieval period had many trade routes but one of the most important was the Silk Road. It connected East Asia and Southeast Asia with Persia, South Asia and the Arabian Peninsula.
Different trade routes were specialized in different products and they used to exchange their specialized products to get other products. Like Europe had iron; Africa had gold, salt and ivory; Arabian Peninsula specialized in perfumes and dates; textiles and cotton were from India and China was famous for silk, paper and gunpowder.
To know more about trade here
brainly.com/question/369313
#SPJ1
National prohibition of alcohol (1920–33) — the “noble experiment” — was undertaken to reduce crime and corruption, solve social problems, reduce the tax burden created by prisons and poorhouses, and improve health and hygiene in America. The results of that experiment clearly indicate that it was a miserable failure on all counts. The evidence affirms sound economic theory, which predicts that prohibition of mutually beneficial exchanges is doomed to failure. The lessons of Prohibition remain important today. They apply not only to the debate over the war on drugs but also to the mounting efforts to drastically reduce access to alcohol and tobacco and to such issues as censorship and bans on insider trading, abortion, and gambling.1
Although consumption of alcohol fell at the beginning of Prohibition, it subsequently increased. Alcohol became more dangerous to consume; crime increased and became “organized”; the court and prison systems were stretched to the breaking point; and corruption of public officials was rampant. No measurable gains were made in productivity or reduced absenteeism. Prohibition removed a significant source of tax revenue and greatly increased government spending. It led many drinkers to switch to opium, marijuana, patent medicines, cocaine, and other dangerous substances that they would have been unlikely to encounter in the absence of Prohibition.
Those results are documented from a variety of sources, most of which, ironically, are the work of supporters of Prohibition — most economists and social scientists supported it. Their findings make the case against Prohibition that much stronger. Hope this helps! Mark brainly please!
Explanation:
Cahokia was the largest and most influential urban settlement of the Mississippian culture, which developed advanced societies across much of what is now the Central and the Southeastern United States, beginning more than 1,000 years before European contact.
Answer:
i do not know the answer to your question
According to the sites that I've visited and read, the answer to your question "<span>The victory in brown v. board of education was limited by a follow-up 1955 ruling __________" </span> is letter c. allowing states "all deliberate speed" by which to comply with the decision.
