Explanation:
First one should be can..
Section one should also be can..
hope it helps you friend..
No sis I’m just kidding about the same shorts you can do you do today and you have no one cared for you I just got a text and saying that I was really confused and
Answer:
Swarbrick is young compared with other parliamentarians, and she feels that the older generation cannot understand the threat of global warming.
Explanation:
The given passage is from the text titled <em>"OK, boomer,
" retorts lawmaker to heckler during climate change meeting
</em>.
It tells about Chlöe Swarbrick's speech in the New Zealand Parliament. Bringing the attention of the rest of the parliament to an important issue, climate change, she mentions her age, emphasizing that it will be the younger generations who will be dealing with the consequences of global warming, not most of the members of the parliament, who will no longer be its members in a couple of decades. They do not understand the threat of global warming, which is why they are not paying attention to it, despite the fact they should.
This is why the third option is the correct one.
Answer:
- Cue your listeners.
Explanation:
As per the question, <u>the technique that has been employed here 'cue your listeners' as it signals or hints the readers about the author's purpose and nature of the content</u>. These cues help the speaker to provide an indication to the readers about his specific intent for creation of a particular work and leads the readers to elicit desired response. The 'faster rate of speech' function as a cue/hint to develop excitement while 'a slower rate' indicates that the tone is 'serious' and the speaker intends to convey something serious and significant.
