Answer:
Explanation:
D0 = $1.88
D1 = 1.88*1.25 = $2.35
D2 = 2.35*1.25 = $2.94
D3 = 2.94*1.25 = $3.67
PV of Dividends:
r = 12%
1/(1.12) = 0.89
PV of D1 = 2.35/0.89 = $2.64
PV of D2 = 2.94/0.797 = $3.69
PV of D3 = 3.67/0.71 = $5.17
Total PV = $11.5
Value after year 3:
(D3*Growth rate)/(Required rate - growth rate) = $3.67*1.06/(0.12-0.06) = $64.8
Pv of 64.8 is 64.8/(1.12)^3 = $46.3
So, the maximum price per share is 11.5+46.3 = $57.8
As Accenture explores an end-to-end business flow that has reconciliation between multiple parties system, we would be able to uncover shared state.
Any variable, object, or memory area that resides in a shared scope is referred to as a shared states. Accenture Blockchain and Multiparty Systems specializes in supply chain, digital identity and financial services.
Multiparty systems creates a shared data infrastructure between an individual and an organization that drives efficiency and creates a new business and revenue models. they include blockchain, distributed ledger, distributed database, tokenization and a variety of other technologies and capabilities.
To learn more about Accenture here
brainly.com/question/28169672
#SPJ4
Answer:
An contract is an understanding agreement that can be implemented in court it is a shaped by two or more gatherings who consent to perform or to cease from playing out some demonstration now or later on . The target hypothesis of agreements not by the individual or subjective aim or conviction of a gathering .The hypothesis is that gathering's expectation to go into an agreement is judged by outward destinations truths as deciphered by a sensible individual ,as opposed to by the gathering's mystery subjective aims . the essential components of a substantial contract and the path in which an agreement is made. The agreements that fall under this circumstance would be the agreement of arrangement contract of development ,contract of execution and the agreement of enforceability. The main contract would be the agreement of arrangement .They are contracts that are grouped in light of how when an agreement of development .
In the event that Ed had constantly paid for all the earlier pieces of candy, there gives off an impression of being suggested in actuality contract taking into account the earlier course of dealings amongst Ed and Fran.
Waving the sweet treat at Fran can be seen as an affirmation that Ed was not surreptitiously taking the piece of candy, but rather was demonstrating that he would get her the cash for that one later. His questionable signal in light of the gatherings earlier course of managing could sensibly be translated by Fran as a nonverbal IOU at the cost of that 1 piece of candy.There can likewise be an inferred in law contract taking into account the same certainties since to not force a suggested in law guarantee to pay results in the uncalled for improvement of Ed at the expense of Fran.Either sort of inferred contract is enforceable in Court.
Cost = $4,000
Revenues = $3,200 per year
Life = 5 years
Payback period calculation:
Year ----- Cash flow -------- Investment
Yr 0 ----- ------------ -4,000
Yr 1 ------ 3,200 ----------- -800
Yr 2 ------ 3,200 -------------- 0
Payback period lies between year 1 and 2.
Therefore,
Payback period = 1+ 800/3200 = 1+0.25 = 1.25 years
<u>Answer:
</u>
By implementing the food safety compliance policy, the food company would only make sure that the food they have given is safely consumable, but by putting consumer safety first, the companies would go beyond the attempts to avoid fine and take special measures to ensure true safety of the consumers.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Though the Food and Drug Administration of the United States bears the responsibility of food safety and is accountable towards both, the public and the government, it would not be possible without the cooperation of the food companies to ensure utter food safety for the public.
- With stringent supervision and the companies sticking to the norms and regulations put by the supervising agencies, it would be possible to eradicate the problems caused by food contamination.