1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irina1246 [14]
3 years ago
15

In the 1776 reading on Free Suffrage, the author asserts that restricting voting rights to people who owned land was

History
1 answer:
Gala2k [10]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A. Unjustified

Explanation:

In the 1776 reading on Free Suffrage, the author asserts that restricting voting rights to people who owned land was "UNJUSTIFIED."

This is because by restricting the people who did not own land or property the voting rights are like being ruled by someone they have no choice in his emergence and at the same time as being own.

According to the author, if there is a restriction of voting rights to only people who owned land, then those without land and voting rights are not truly equal with the former. Hence, it is unjustified because. America was established based on having a government whereby they can have a choice and choose to decide who will govern them.

You might be interested in
Can someone please write a small description of the Civial Rights Act of 1964
shutvik [7]
The Civil Rights Act of 1964, which ended segregation in public places and banned employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin, is considered one of the crowning legislative achievements of the civil rights movement.
6 0
3 years ago
When did Augustin de Iturbide declare independence?
zimovet [89]

Agustín de Iturbide was born on September 27, 1783 in Valladolid, Mexico. When the Revolution first began, he started as an officer and then became the commander of the Northern Mexican army. Wanting to find a way to peacefully gain independence from Spain, Iturbide helped create the Plan of Iguala,<u> issued in 1821.</u>

4 0
3 years ago
The chart below shows the percentage of total government revenue from oil in Nigeria between 1967 and 1990.
katrin2010 [14]
According to the graph, we can say that <span>Nigeria was generating greater revenue from oil in 1990 compared to previous years. </span><span>If we look on the table, we can see how the oil industry has covered more of the economy, so if it went down, Nigeria would get in serious economical problems.</span>

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do the governments of Mexico and Denmark have in common?
Afina-wow [57]

Answer:

The United States of Mexico is a federal presidential republic. The Constitution of 1917 is in force with numerous amendments. Executive power belongs to the president, who is the head of state and government. The President forms the cabinet, appoints and removes ministers, the Attorney General (with the approval of the Senate), members of the Supreme Court (with the approval of the Senate) and other senior public servants. The President determines domestic and foreign policy, has legislative initiative and veto power, establishes diplomatic relations and concludes international treaties. The president is elected by the people on the basis of universal, direct, secret ballot, without the right to re-election. Legislative power belongs to the bicameral National Congress. The principles of public administration in accordance with the 1917 Constitution meet the criteria for representative liberal democracy.

Denmark is a constitutional monarchy. The constitution was adopted in 1849; amendments were made in 1915 and 1953, when a unicameral parliament was created and women were allowed to become head of state. The head of state is the king, who exercises legislative power together with a unicameral parliament. The highest legislative body is Folketing. Executive power belongs to the monarch and is carried out on his behalf by the government. The government is appointed by the Prime Minister, approved by Folketing and is accountable to him.

Thus, the similarity is the fact that in Mexico the president and in Denmark the king determine domestic and foreign policy. However, the difference is obvious, primarily consisting in the very form of government - the republic and the monarchy, respectively, with all the further differences that follow from this.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Record at least eight examples of how interest groups are good or bad for democracy.
solong [7]
List of Cons of Interest Groups

1. They would often seek for the minority of people. 
Interest groups lead to pluralism, which critics contend that there is no common good, as there are many conflicting interests in society. What is good for one individual can be bad for other people. Critics also argue that interest groups would interfere with democracy, as they seek out benefits for minorities rather than the greater good of the majority. For example, the National Rifle Association has repeatedly blocked gun-control legislations, despite the fact that most citizens in the US actually want stricter laws on firearms.

2. They only have one track in mind. 
As interest groups usually have a single track in mind, they would only think about and look at their personal opinions, and not at those of the majority.

3. They are only effective for themselves. 
Another big argument by critics about these groups is that their system can really be effective only for economic interest groups, which normally have greater financial resources at their disposal. It is also believed that these groups would ignore the interests of the poor in favor of the middle and upper-class, who have more money and time to contribute.

4. They would commit serious crimes. 
According to past news, there are interest groups that have committed serious crimes, such as corruption, bribery, fraud, etc. There are even those who were involved in some cases and accused of giving threats to domestic social orders and extremists.

List of Pros of Interest Groups

1. They use a democratic process. 
Interest groups contribute a helpful democratic process to protect certain individuals as alternative in daunting the majority. Because of this, many people have the freedom to express and speak their suggestions and opinions.

2. They check the power of majorities. 
In the US political system, there exist the principles of democracy, which include the majority rule, but there is also the protection of rights of people who do not belong to the majority. Interest groups, such as those based on gender, ethnic and religious identities, can perform important checks on the powers of the majority.

3. They have the ability to motivate legislators. 
These groups can easily motivate legislators in promulgating their beliefs optimistically.

4. They allow for better representation of interests. 
Members of interest groups and other social movements believe that they should better advance their causes and interests, whether it is protecting civil rights, voting rights and the environment, by uniting themselves for collective action. By doing so, they demonstrate strength in numbers when it comes to politics.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What led england to establish colonies in north america
    6·1 answer
  • About how much of the world's area is tropical rain forest
    5·1 answer
  • Write a paragraph that explains the main reasons the United States joined the fighting in this world war. Evaluate the validity
    12·1 answer
  • How did the Zimmerman telegram influence U.S. entry into world war 1
    5·1 answer
  • Why did earlier historians consider the Medieval Period the "Dark Ages"?
    5·1 answer
  • American cities weren’t all that bad, were they in the 1900s?
    12·1 answer
  • During the Pleistocene Group of answer choices the earths's climate was generally warmer than today. glaciers advanced and retre
    9·1 answer
  • Which of your governments (national, state, county, municipal/township, or school district) do you believe has the greatest effe
    9·1 answer
  • What was England attempting to build in Africa, only to be denied by the Germans
    9·1 answer
  • The Socratic Method was, and is, used in what other fields of study?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!