1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Law Incorporation [45]
3 years ago
5

Which of the following was an advantage that the Aztecs and Incas held over the conquistadors? They had superior weapons. Their

soldiers were better trained. They had greater numbers of men. Their soldiers fought on horseback.
History
1 answer:
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

They had greater numbers of men.

Explanation:

The main advantage that the Aztecs and Incas held over the conquistadors was that they had a greater number of men. This is because the conquistadors were only a few dozen men, while the native people consisted of large empires. However, the conquistadors had horses, while the Natives did not. Moreover, the Spaniards had superior weapons and were better trained.

You might be interested in
One who wants to do away with something particularly slavery in the 1800s
Yuki888 [10]
If someone wants slavery to be gone they are called slave savers
7 0
3 years ago
Why were greek men expected keep their bodies in shape?
REY [17]
Every Greek man was expected to keep in shape in case he was called up to the military. (War in Greece was almost constant.)
5 0
2 years ago
What impact did slavery have on the southern economy?
Andrej [43]
Slavery helped contribute to the south's cotton boom during the 1800's. this cotton boom helped raise the economy up. But during Civil War slavery was banned from the U.S. leaving the south after their defeat to lose the slaves and dropping the south into an economic depression.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Mongol migratory patterns affect their production and distribution?
vagabundo [1.1K]

Answer: Mongols did not necessarily need to expand their territories as much as they did. The pull factor for Mongol imperialism is directly related to the push factors. They may have included climactic and geographic issues impacting the nomadic tribes but most likely were due to the Mongols being enthusiastically militaristic.

3 0
3 years ago
The m the most fundamental weakness of the articles of confederation was a lack of
Nadusha1986 [10]
Lack of Power to raise funds for the militia. The significant defeat of the Articles of Confederation was just shortcoming. The government, under the Articles, was excessively feeble, making it impossible to authorize their laws and in this way had no power. The Continental Congress had acquired cash to battle the Revolutionary War and couldn't reimburse their obligations.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • After World War II, which of the following did West German socialist chancellors include in their expansion of the welfare state
    11·1 answer
  • Women got involved in helping fight slavery in all ways EXCEPT.
    6·1 answer
  • Romans practiced _____, meaning that a man married only one woman. A)Monogamy B)Polygamy
    7·2 answers
  • National unity meaning
    11·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of reservations?
    5·1 answer
  • Did Europeans treat African fairly
    14·1 answer
  • Which cause and effect relationship is correctly matched?
    6·1 answer
  • Whom did the <br> revolutionaries choose <br> as the commander of <br> Galveston?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements are correct? Check all of the boxes that apply.
    10·1 answer
  • What is this answer ASAP PLS HELP
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!