Answer:
the answer is D it is the right answer
Answer:
The correct answer is Production loss.
Explanation:
The quantifiable cost associated with the interruption of the operation of a pump is low when compared to the cost throughout its useful life in an installation carried out in a commercial building. However, the loss of comfort suffered by users of the building makes it advisable to have a spare pump.
Unlike what happens in production processes, stopping a pump from a commercial building almost never results in a loss of production. On the contrary, the interruption is usually translated into a loss of comfort. However, the immeasurable costs associated with downtime may be even higher if, for example, hotel guests run out of water. Therefore, it is always advisable to install a replacement pump to prevent comfort losses caused by an unexpected failure in the pumping system. The communication capabilities of electronically controlled pumps E help minimize downtime because replacement and repair work can be completed more quickly in the event of a breakdown. A backup pump is used to prevent downtime and consequent loss of comfort in the event of a breakdown.
Answer:
a. $21,725.65
b. $19,385
c. 27,421.32
Explanation:
Savings = 125,000
Annuity Formula :
[ 
( 
) ] = 
( 
)
Solving the equation we get,
A = $21,725.65
Answer:
<h2>The United States has the comparative advantage in car production.</h2>
Explanation:
- Japan has a lower opportunity cost of producing televisions compared to cars, implying that Japan basically has to give up or sacrifice or trade off relatively less number of cars to produce one more television compared to the production of one more car.
- Alternatively, US has a lower opportunity cost of producing cars relative to televisions meaning that US has to give up, sacrifice or trade off less number of televisions to manufacture one more car in comparison to the production of one more television.
- Hence, in this case,US has a comparative advantage in the production of cars and Japan has a comparative advantage in production of television and both countries can produce these respective commodities by using relatively less productive resources or factor inputs.
