1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vika [28.1K]
3 years ago
8

In schenck v. united states (1919), justice holmes said that speech can be restricted when

History
2 answers:
love history [14]3 years ago
8 0
The correct answer is B.

The Schenk case dealt with Schenk encouraging people to avoid the military draft during World War I. He was arrested but argued that his first amendment freedom of speech was violated. After making its way through state and local courts, the case made it all the way to the Supreme Court.  However, the court ruled it was NOT protected by the first amendment right of freedom of speech. This is because it caused a clear danger to the US war effort, which could cause the US to lose World War I.
leva [86]3 years ago
8 0
B--when it presents a clear and present danger to society. 

This decision came during wartime and Justice Holmes was clear that circumstances determine if speech can be restricted. 

Schenck sent pamphlets to drafted soldiers during World War I stating the government should not ask men to kill other men. During war, this speech can be dangerous and therefore restricted. If it was said during peacetime, then there is no danger and Schenck would have been free to express. 
You might be interested in
Why did president Andrew Jackson oppose the national bank?
evablogger [386]
Moreover, Jackson felt that the national bank was a threat to the American economy and to the American people. Between 1832 and 1833, Jackson used his presidential veto to dismantle the Second Bank of the United States by vetoing its congressional recharter. During 1833, he took further action against the national bank system by removing federal funds from the Second Bank of the United States and relocating the capital into loyal state banks throughout the nation.
6 0
3 years ago
Match these Items.
vodomira [7]

Answer:

give me brainlist

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Tupac Amaru was the last ruler of the _____.<br><br> Aztecs<br> Toltecs<br> Incas<br> Mexicas
max2010maxim [7]

Answer:

C.) Incas

Explanation:

Túpac Amaru (1545 – 24 September 1572) was the last monarch (Sapa Inca) of the Neo-Inca State, the remnants of the Inca Empire in Vilcabamba, Peru. He was executed by the Spanish following a months-long pursuit after the fall of the last stronghold of the Neo-Inca State.

7 0
2 years ago
Which statement describes how a woman rolls change after a world war II
Harlamova29_29 [7]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Que paso en el primero y segundo gobierno patrio
Phantasy [73]

Answer:

???

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did Americans initially support the French revolution
    10·1 answer
  • The Kerner Commission blamed the problems of inner cities on
    9·1 answer
  • Describe the Era of Good Feeling in the young nation. Discuss the economy, social issues, conflict/war, the political structure,
    7·1 answer
  • Bakit kailangan pag-aralan ang asya?​
    15·1 answer
  • Who were the primary leaders in the New England colonies? (4 points)
    12·1 answer
  • How did advancements in farming cause farmers to struggle during the 1890s?
    8·1 answer
  • How did economic opportunity divide urban and rural dwellers?
    12·1 answer
  • Twentieth century conflicts such as world war 1 and war world 2 were often followed by periods of even more fighting because the
    8·1 answer
  • A states number of representatives may increase or decrease depending on changes to the
    14·1 answer
  • We hold these truths to be self evident that all men and women are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with ce
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!