1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vika [28.1K]
4 years ago
8

In schenck v. united states (1919), justice holmes said that speech can be restricted when

History
2 answers:
love history [14]4 years ago
8 0
The correct answer is B.

The Schenk case dealt with Schenk encouraging people to avoid the military draft during World War I. He was arrested but argued that his first amendment freedom of speech was violated. After making its way through state and local courts, the case made it all the way to the Supreme Court.  However, the court ruled it was NOT protected by the first amendment right of freedom of speech. This is because it caused a clear danger to the US war effort, which could cause the US to lose World War I.
leva [86]4 years ago
8 0
B--when it presents a clear and present danger to society. 

This decision came during wartime and Justice Holmes was clear that circumstances determine if speech can be restricted. 

Schenck sent pamphlets to drafted soldiers during World War I stating the government should not ask men to kill other men. During war, this speech can be dangerous and therefore restricted. If it was said during peacetime, then there is no danger and Schenck would have been free to express. 
You might be interested in
PLEASE QUICK ANSWER!!
Dominik [7]

Answer:

D. states revoked their ratification

Explanation:

hope this helps!

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was responsible for the counter reformation?
professor190 [17]
Pope Paul III
I'm 97% sure at least.
3 0
3 years ago
1) Which statement best describes economic conditions in the Weimar Republic after World War I?
postnew [5]

Correct answer: D) The German government printed extra money to pay protesting workers, causing hyperinflation.

Explanation:  The Treaty of Versailles (1919), signed after the end of World War I, was very harsh in the terms imposed against Germany.  Germany was forced to pay large reparation payments to the countries that it had fought against in the war.  Along with accepting full responsibility for causing the war, Germany was ordered make monetary payments for the damage caused "as a consequence of the aggression of Germany and her allies."   Occupation of territories in the Rhine and Ruhr valleys was threatened if Germany did not make good on reparations payments.

The Germany economy was crippled by the payments it was supposed to make, and its government (as the Weimar Republic) was unable to keep up with the payments.  In 1923, French troops occupied the Ruhr region.  Germans living in the region responded with civil disobedience and a workers strike.  The Weimar Republic government sided with the workers and printed bank notes to pay the workers while they were on strike.  Printing additional money with no real economic foundation to support the increased money supply led to extreme inflation.  The German economy got worse and worse.

Then came the Great Depression, beginning in 1929.  The Great Depression was worse in Germany than in America.  The hyperinflation in Germany got so bad so that their currency became essentially worthless.  I've attached a photo which shows children playing with stacks of money as if they were building block toys -- because they weren't really worth anything as money.

The bad situation in Germany made it possible for a radical leader like Hitler, making all sorts of bold promises, to win over enough people to rise to power.  

4 0
3 years ago
Throughout this speech, Dr. King chooses to reference famous American works, speeches, and songs, as well as the bible. Why do y
Studentka2010 [4]

King is trying to show how the promises made by the founding fathers – in documents like the Emancipation Proclamation and the Declaration of Independence – had not been fulfilled.King is trying to show that segregation and discrimination is not Godly or Christian.King does not believe that America can truly be great as long as there is inequality.<span>King is trying to argue that great men in history – like Jefferson and Lincoln – would support the civil rights movement.</span>
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the contents separate
Taya2010 [7]
What contents are you talking about?
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Identify whether the following individuals were Arab or Israeli leaders.
    5·1 answer
  • How did wilson arrive at the decision that women deserve the right to vote?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of these is an accurate SIMILARITY between the Georgia Constitution and the U.S. Constitution?
    14·1 answer
  • Julius caesar why was ligarius chosen as the eight conspirators
    15·1 answer
  • How have Texans profited through the use of maquiladoras?
    12·1 answer
  • Population growth during the Gilded Age was due in large part to
    12·1 answer
  • NAFTA has six advantages. First, it quadrupled trade between Canada, Mexico, and the United States. That's because the agreement
    12·1 answer
  • Why did the US attack Iwo Jima?
    12·1 answer
  • Short Answer
    8·1 answer
  • Can some one help me on what to write about this?pleas
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!