The importance of your rights?
Answer:
NO
Explanation:
Al-Dabagh, a dermatologist, was said to have completed all the academic requirements at Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) for him to become a medical doctor. They school did not give him the required certificate with series of cases brought against him for being unprofessional in his conducts.
Many times, he was found late, and that delayed the classes on several occasions. There are also times he was said to have put up inappropriate acts with some girls in his class and in another incidence, it was said that he rode on a cab and refused to pay afterwards. Though he denied all these, but that did not convince the university to shift ground.
There was a trial court judgment that he should be given the certificate he merited. CWRU decided to appeal the case further and the supreme court reversed the judgement made by the trial court, reaffirming the stance of the university.
Answer:
- Talking about the conversation with a compliance officer of his firm
- Accept unsolicited trades from costumers in the company's stock
Explanation:
The agent listened to another company's employee talking on the phone about confidential information, that is, private information that the agent should not be listening to, but he has heard and can use it to his company's advantage. Since no one knows that the agent has this information, he can talk about the conversation he has heard with a compliance officer at his company, and he can accept unsolicited dealings from customers on the company's stock.
Answer:
<em>Here </em><em>is </em><em>my </em><em>answer </em><em>for </em><em>ur </em><em>question</em>
<em>Police </em><em>writing</em><em> </em><em>is </em><em>important </em><em>for </em><em>a </em><em>number </em><em>of </em><em>reasons</em><em> </em><em>bcauz </em><em>of </em><em>the </em><em>immense </em><em>number </em><em>of </em><em>suspects </em><em>that </em><em>the </em><em>police </em><em>officers</em><em> </em><em>deal </em><em>with </em><em>on </em><em>a </em><em>daily</em><em> </em><em>basis </em><em>so </em><em>there</em><em>f</em><em>ore </em><em>it </em><em>is </em><em>virtually</em><em> </em><em>that </em><em>is </em><em>very </em><em>impossible</em><em> </em><em>for </em><em>any </em><em>police </em><em>to </em><em>remember </em><em>every </em><em>detail</em><em> </em><em>with </em><em>the </em><em>case </em><em>without</em><em> </em><em>making</em><em> </em><em>any </em><em>notes </em>
<em><u>I </u></em><em><u>think</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>this </u></em><em><u>might </u></em><em><u>help </u></em><em><u>ur </u></em><em><u>question</u></em>
Answer:
Pearson v. Callahan
Explanation:
This was a case that was decided by the United States which would deal with the doctrine of qualified immunity.
Hope this Helps!