1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MrRa [10]
3 years ago
14

What role did politics change global relations between countries in modern era?

History
1 answer:
AVprozaik [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:The United States is today the only truly global power. Its military reach—whether on land, at sea, or in the air—extends to every point on the globe. Its economic prowess fuels world trade and industry. Its political and cultural appeal—what Joseph Nye has called soft power—is so extensive that most international institutions reflect American interests. America’s position in the world is unique—no other country in history has ever come close.

But is America’s exalted position sustainable? Militarily, the vast gap between the United States and everyone else is growing. Whereas defense spending in most other countries is falling, U.S. defense spending is rising rapidly. This year’s requested increase in defense spending is greater than the entire Chinese defense budget. Most remarkably, America can afford to spend more. Defense spending takes a smaller share of the U.S. gross domestic product than it did a decade ago—and even the Bush administration’s projected increases will produce an overall budget equal to only about 3.5 percent of GDP, about half of Cold War highs. There is little prospect of any country or group of countries devoting the resources necessary to begin competing with the United States militarily, let alone surpassing it.

Economically, the United States may not widen its edge over its competitors, but neither is it likely to fall behind. The U.S. economy has proven itself at least as adept as its major competitors in realizing the productivity gains made possible by information technology. Europe and Japan face severe demographic challenges as their populations rapidly age, creating likely labor shortages and severe budgetary pressures. China is modernizing rapidly, and Russia may have turned the corner, but their economies today are comparable in output to those of Italy and Belgium—and they have yet to develop a political infrastructure that can support sustained economic growth.

Which brings us to the issue of how to transform this unquestioned power into influence. Unless employed deftly, America’s military and economic superiority can breed resentment, even among its friends. A growing perception that Washington cares only about its own interests and is willing to use its muscle to get its way has fueled a worrisome gap between U.S. and European attitudes. European elites increasingly criticize the United States as being morally, socially, and culturally retrograde—especially in its perceived embrace of the death penalty, predatory capitalism, and fast food and mass entertainment. Europe has also begun to exercise diplomatic muscle in international institutions and other arenas, seeking to create new international regimes designed to limit America’s recourse to its hard power.

Explanation:

eptember 11 signaled the end of the age of geopolitics and the advent of a new age—the era of global politics. The challenge U.S. policymakers face today is to recognize that fundamental change in world politics and to use America’s unrivaled military, economic, and political power to fashion an international environment conducive to its interests and values.

For much of the 20th century, geopolitics drove American foreign policy. Successive presidents sought to prevent any single country from dominating the centers of strategic power in Europe and Asia. To that end the United States fought two world wars and carried on its four-decade-long Cold War with the Soviet Union. The collapse of the Soviet empire ended the last serious challenge for territorial dominion over Eurasia. The primary goal of American foreign policy was achieved.

During the 1990s, American foreign policy focused on consolidating its success. Together with its European allies, the United States set out to create, for the first time in history, a peaceful, undivided, and democratic Europe. That effort is now all but complete. The European Union—which will encompass most of Europe with the expected accession of 10 new members in 2004—has become the focal point for European policy on a wide range of issues. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization has evolved from a collective defense alliance into Europe’s main security institution. A new relationship with Russia is being forged.

Progress has been slower, though still significant, in Asia. U.S. relations with its two key regional partners, Japan and South Korea, remain the foundation of regional stability. Democracy is taking root in South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia, and Taiwan. U.S. engagement with China is slowly tying an economically surging Beijing into the global economy.

You might be interested in
How was Erich Maria Remarque's novel All Quiet on the Western Front
Nookie1986 [14]

Answer:

It realistically depicted the suffering felt by soldiers.

3 0
3 years ago
Which was not a negative consequence of child labor
Naddika [18.5K]

Answer: B. They earned more money than their parents

Explanation:

Child Laborers in the United States was a very widespread practice in the 1800s and early 1900s. These children suffered all manner of abuse and were made to do work that even adults should not do sometimes.

As a result they missed out on school and worked in jobs so dangerous that they risked injury or even death. Some might have made more than their parents if their parents had no job but the money that these children made contributed to the welfare of their family so this was not a negative consequence of child labor.

3 0
3 years ago
The Unites states entered a time of prosperity, what two things caused that
algol13

Answer:

A. The mainland was not badly damaged and the war industries were turned into production sites for the production of goods for the increasing population.

B. Advancement in technology  and increase in consumer's spending.

Explanation:

This period was the post WW II era in the 1950's, It was a period that brought about the speedy growth in the economy prosperity of the U.S.  This was due to the low damaged the war caused on the country and the bad damage that was done to other super powers of the world who were the major supplier of goods before the war.

Moreover, there was massive growth in the population which resulted into high demand for goods there by  leading into massive production wish in return lead to an economy boom  because the war industries were turned into production sites to produce goods.

It was a period that was tagged "BABY BOOM" where the economy grew by 37%  and brought about high spending by consumer due to availability of jobs that resulted into high wages.

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
the united states senate refused to ratify the treaty of versailles after ww1 because many senators believes?
vivado [14]
<span>The main reason for the Senate's rejection of the treaty was to avoid the "foreign entanglements" of the League. However, a more sinister reason might have been that the Republican dominated Senate disliked President Woodrow Wilson (who refused to have any Republican leaders with him on the trip to Versailles) and wanted his plans for the treaty and the League to fail.

</span>
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The human and economic costs of world war 1 included
Fofino [41]

Answer:

The correct answer is option A and B

Explanation:

The Primary Universal War demolished domains, made various new country states, supported autonomy developments in Europe's provinces, constrained the US to turn into a politically influential nation and drove straightforwardly to Soviet socialism and the ascent of Hitler. Discretionary unions and guarantees made during the Main Universal War, particularly in the Center East, additionally caused issues down the road for Europeans a century later. The overall influence way to deal with worldwide relations was broken yet not broke. It took the Subsequent Universal Battle to achieve adequate political powers to set out on a progressive new way to deal with between state relations.

After the two wars Europe was depleted and crushed. The thing that matters was that the second major internecine battle in Europe in an age prompted a significant change in political intuition, at any rate in Western Europe, about how states should lead their relations. Bite the dust Stunde Invalid was the scenery to the progressive thoughts of the EU's 'establishing fathers,' legislators, for example, Robert Schuman, Alcide De Gasperi, Jean Monnet who built up the original thought of a network of states building up a political framework dependent on sharing power. This framework has carried numerous advantages to Europeans however lately the framework has been under test by the ascent of Euro doubt, populism and patriotism. As Europe ponders the titanic battle of 1914-18 it is imperative to review the advances made since 1945 through European incorporation and increase endeavors to battle patriot and radical powers.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which executive officials are most closely associated with the lawmaking process
    10·1 answer
  • 1. Define the idea of Manifest Destiny in your own words.
    11·1 answer
  • In the Spring of 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed into law a bill which allowed him to sell, loan, or give war mater
    6·2 answers
  • Why did civil rights leaders seek to desegregate schools
    10·2 answers
  • Robert Smalls was born into slavery in South Carolina and was hired out to work on steamboats as a youth.
    7·1 answer
  • Why did westerners develop a need for better transportation
    11·1 answer
  • What where the two most important contributions of the Phoenicians
    13·1 answer
  • Woodrow Wilson, a leader of the Progressive Movement, was the 28th President of the United States (1913-1921). After a policy of
    8·1 answer
  • Which part of Texas did Coronado and his expedition travel across?
    6·2 answers
  • MAY YOU GUYS HELP ME ON THIS PLEASE!!!!!, THIS IS DUE IN 30 MINUTES.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!