1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hichkok12 [17]
3 years ago
11

The Embargo Act of 1807, which banned trade with _________, was a great failure.

History
1 answer:
Maurinko [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The Embargo Act of 1807 was an attempt by President Thomas Jefferson and the U.S. Congress to prohibit American ships from trading in foreign ports. It was intended to punish Britain and France for interfering with American trade while the two major European powers were at war with each other.

I hope this helped if not im sorry

You might be interested in
The nomadic horsemen of central asia had what crucial advantage when interacting with other peoples?
dimaraw [331]

Answer:

They had acquired resistance to many diseases

6 0
1 year ago
Which is the best evidence of continued tensions over the expansion of slavery? A) Utopian Societies B) Nullification crisis C)
kondor19780726 [428]

Answer:

the answer is C

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Describe Herbert Hoover in a sentence?
STatiana [176]
He was a American politician and engineer. Was the 31 president.
6 0
2 years ago
How did the Declaration of Independence justify rejecting the British government?
Nataliya [291]

Answer:

i think we signed andon top of that we won world war II

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the authority behind both the mayflower compact and the declaration of independence?
ira [324]

Answer:

The Declaration of Independence was issued “by authority of the good people of these colonies.” It was a revolution, you know.

The Pilgrims did not cite any specific authority for the Mayflower Compact. However, they declared themselves to be loyal subjects of the king of Great Britain. The Compact was based on their experience in organizing dissenting churches in England and, I suppose, in the Netherlands, where they had sought shelter from persecution. In some ways it was in keeping with the English common law, which dealt with problems and controversies as they arose, rather than waiting for the government to settle them. But in some ways it was a revolutionary, democratic statement, asserting the colonists’ right to make their own laws.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is trading good for both people or groups involved?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements is not true about the colony of
    6·1 answer
  • Drag and drop the words to complete the sentence. Words may be used once or not at all. Jordan and TurkeyIsrael and Saudi Arabia
    9·2 answers
  • What was the primary purpose of the articles of confederation? Why did some state’s refuse to ratify it? What convinced all stat
    7·1 answer
  • What was a goal of Cecil Calvert?
    6·2 answers
  • Why was it difficult to negotiate a fair treaty with native people?
    5·2 answers
  • What was the basic message that Jesus preached ? Now and why did that message spread ?
    9·2 answers
  • Which were outcomes/effects of the Civil War?
    6·1 answer
  • Please kindly help in fully explaining the 5 notable vegetations in Africa?​
    10·1 answer
  • Checks & Balances allows each branch of government to check the other two branches. Read the statement below and decide whic
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!