1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rina8888 [55]
2 years ago
15

The British colonized Australia and made a penal colony for prisoners. Why did the British use Australia as a place to send pris

ioners?
History
1 answer:
zmey [24]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

please give me brainlist and follow

Explanation:

Between 1788 and 1868, about 162,000 convicts were transported from Britain and Ireland to various penal colonies in Australia. ... When transportation ended with the start of the American Revolution, an alternative site was needed to relieve further overcrowding of British prisons and hulks.

You might be interested in
Who are the mountain men?<br><br> settlers<br> independent trappers<br> guides<br> business leaders.
-BARSIC- [3]

Answer:

Guides are the mountain men .

hope it is helpful to you ☺️☺️☺️

6 0
3 years ago
How did the son of liberty successfully plan Boston tea party?
vlabodo [156]

Answer:

Led by Adams, the Sons of Liberty held meetings rallying against British Parliament and protested the Griffin's Wharf arrival of Dartmouth, a British East India Company ship carrying tea. ... Governor Thomas Hutchison refused to allow the ships to return to Britain and ordered the tea tariff be paid and the tea unloaded.


hope this helps~

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Which was a goal of both the compromise of 1820 (missouri compromise) and the compromise of 1850?
horrorfan [7]
I believe the best option would be A because both compromises aimed to appease the growing friction between the north and south.
3 0
3 years ago
Why did the author include a timeline in this text ? A . To help the reader understand what these events occurred, B . To take u
Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The author added this to give the reader a grasp of what's happening at what time.

8 0
2 years ago
Why did some people support supply-side economics and others opposed it?
vovikov84 [41]

Answer:

Explanation:

I don't see how this is possible, but the answer seems to be A which is the only answer that makes sense.

Large tax cuts don't have anything to do with supply of goods. It does help consumption but that is not the same thing as supply side economics.

C is much truer for the aftermath of WWI than a general statement about Supply. I don't think it is the right answer.

It didn't call for increased government spending unless the government wanted the goods being produced.

I think I'd go with A. It is the most straight forward.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What were viking ships commonly made to represent?
    13·1 answer
  • As part of the New Deal, the Securities and
    12·1 answer
  • What is a four-sided pillar that is pointed on the top
    8·2 answers
  • What led the southern states to secede from the union in 1860 and 1861?
    6·2 answers
  • How does media effect the way elections are conducted
    10·1 answer
  • A saying in an old almanac was, "He riseth late must trot all day." What does this mean?
    11·2 answers
  • what is the difference between "general will" and "individual will"? why does Rousseau claim the general will is always good?
    11·1 answer
  • Will give brainiest!
    11·1 answer
  • Which event is an example checks and
    15·1 answer
  • In what areas do the authors say women were considered superior to men? APUSH
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!