I believe it’s John Harrington
I would have to say c) because the chief executive would always have to much power a would get his or her way
Historians view the Chester Arthur presidency as an important
surprise, one that no one would have expected. Put simply, he performed
well in office, defying his state-based reputation as a slick machine
politician. Despite his poor health, he attempted to govern competently,
and he succeeded to a degree that was never acknowledged by his fellow
politicians, the press, or the great mass of Americans.
Although Arthur preferred efficient partisan government service to
one selected by competitive examinations, he nevertheless showed
tremendous flexibility and a willingness to embrace reform. By
struggling with the tariff issue (especially being willing to question
the protectionist doctrines of the Republican Party) and supporting the
modernization of the American Navy, Arthur stands as an important
transitional figure in the reunification of the nation after the bitter
turmoil of the Civil War and Reconstruction. No party hack, Arthur
demonstrated how the office of President could bring out the very best
in its occupants.
Let me know if i had helped you please and thanks
Answer:
Explanation:
Government sanctioned violence under Mao was interpreted by Mao as necessary to preserve the state of continuous revolution, in which China would continue to evolve and shed the shackles of its dynastic past. Although violence was used against political opponents, Mao was more secure in his power and there was not as much threat of overthrow. Mao's main objective in his violent projects, such as the Cultural Revolution,was to keep China from achieving stability and the complacence that may have came with it. Although misguided, his intention was for a new China, united under the doctrine of Communism and with a desire to start fresh, to emerge. Stalin mainly used violence as a tool for suppressing dissent and consolidating his power. He did not want to cause disorder through violence, which was a secondary objective for Mao, but wanted to make sure that no one could challenge his dominance in the USSR. He sent political opponents to gulags or had them killed for the sake of making them disappear, while Mao often sent people in the party to internment camps for "reeducation", only to call upon them later to serve in the government.
<span>Hey! :)
Fugitive Slave Act
Compromise of 1850
Hope this helps! :)</span>
