Answer:
Meditation
Explanation:
Annie and Bart are coworkers, they have to see each other every single day at work. They will have to speak to each other in the future regardless of their differences now. Treating one another with hostility is not good for the atmosphere at work and it may have a negative effect on their productivity level as well.
Because they are coworkers, a traditional lawsuit would not be advisable as it would create farther dispute and the company's name and reputation would suffer. Arbitration may work but again, this would take the dispute to another level of importance, thus not being good for the company.
Mediation keeps the dispute at friends' level which is what both Annie and Bart are. The accident was not serious and they should rise above their pride and try to work things out in a peaceful and not accusatory manner. This would also show the other coworkers and the director that they take their jobs seriously and are not prepare to risk them because of some personal matters.
The correct answer is B) believed that if an individual act from a good motive and a sense of duty, the act is good regardless of the consequences.
The German philosopher Immanuel Kant believed that if an individual acts from a good motive and a sense of duty, the act is good regardless of the consequences.
German philosopher Immanuel Kant was one of the brightest minds of his time.
Kant (1724-1804) focused part of his studies on moral actions of the Ethic of human behavior and actions. To Kant, the categorical imperative was that humans have to stand firmly on their decisions, never biased by their personal references, just led by the good or the bad of the decision or the action.
The answer is b just did it in edg 2021
<span>It was a general in the Continental Army during the War of Independence <span>of the United States. (</span></span><span>it is known for betraying the United States<span>)</span></span>
Her continued presence is morally acceptable in order to eradicate discrimination and promote equality. She has an ethical obligation to receive respect, be treated equally to other employees in the organization, and be free from harassment.
Discriminating against Hispanics in America is wrong for everyone, not just Hispanics. Professionals also have their own codes of ethics. It is moral to continue the employee's employment if she has a reasonable reason to think that by doing so, she can improve her behavior.
The action is ethical if the employee thinks she can prove it to the AG, EEOC, or law enforcement (as necessary) with enough documentation of the behavior. It might be ethical or it might not, depending on the facts, if the employee is facing a personal dilemma regarding her employability and behavior.
To learn more about ethical obligation here,
brainly.com/question/27824491
#SPJ4
