All categories

2 years ago

A car is traveling at a steady speed. It travels 1 3/4 miles in 2 1/3 minutes. How far will it travel in ? In 1 hour?

Mathematics

1 answer:

antiseptic1488 [7]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

45 miles.

Step-by-step explanation:

Ok, so it goes 1.75 (1 3/4) miles in 2 minutes and 20 seconds, or 140 seconds. Divide 1.75 miles by 140 and you get 0.0125 miles per second, or 0.75 (3/4) miles per minute. Multiply 0.75 by 60 minutes and you get 45 miles.

You might be interested in

Need to know the area of the composite figure.

Deffense [45]

Answer:

51 m^2

Step-by-step explanation:

The shaded area is the difference between the area of the overall figure and that of the rectangular cutout.

The applicable formulas are ...

area of a triangle:

A = (1/2)bh

area of a rectangle:

A = bh

area of a trapezoid:

A = (1/2)(b1 +b2)h

___

We note that the area of a triangle depends only on the length of its base and its height. The actual shape does not matter. Thus, we can shift the peak of the triangular portion of the shape (that portion above the top horizontal line) so that it lines up with one vertical side or the other of the figure. That makes the overall shape a trapezoid with bases 16 m and 10 m. The area of that trapezoid is then ...

A = (1/2)(16 m + 10 m)(5 m) = 65 m^2

The area of the white internal rectangle is ...

A = (2 m)(7 m) = 14 m^2

So, the shaded area is the difference:

65 m^2 -14 m^2 = 51 m^2 . . . . shaded area of the composite figure

_____

<em>Alternate approach</em>

Of course, you can also figure the area by adding the area of the triangular "roof" to the area of the larger rectangle, then subtracting the area of the smaller rectangle. Using the above formulas, that approach gives ...

(1/2)(5 m)(16 m - 10 m) + (5 m)(10 m) - (2 m)(7 m) = 15 m^2 + 50 m^2 -14 m^2

= 51 m^2

7 0

3 years ago

I need help with this ASAP please!!

Ilia_Sergeevich [38]

Answer:

Translation 1 unit left

Step-by-step explanation:

we have

f(x)=x

g(x)=(x+1)

we know that

The rule of the transformation of f(x) to g(x) is equal to

f(x) ------> g(x)

(x,y) -----> (x-1,y)

That means----> The translation is 1 unit to the left

6 0

3 years ago

Suppose you add two vectors A and B . What relative direction between them produces the resultant with the greatest magnitude? W

Anna71 [15]

Answer: The resultant would be the sum and the difference between the vectors.

Step by step explanation: 1. The possible resultant is between the sum of the 2 vectors and the difference between the two vectors.

2. The greatest magnitude is when the vectors lie in the same direction and the sum would be the scalar sum of the two vectors. The angle between the two would be zero degree.

6 0

3 years ago

Please answer these questions...

Sphinxa [80]

Answer:-18 and T=3+Y

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

A data mining routine has been applied to a transaction dataset and has classified 88 records as fraudulent (30 correctly so) an

Firlakuza [10]

Answer:

The classification matrix is attached below

Part a

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is 65.91%.

Part b

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is 96.64%

Step-by-step explanation:

The classification matrix is obtained as shown below:

The transaction dataset has 30 fraudulent correctly classified records out of 88 records, that is, 30 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is negative.

Also, there would be 88 - 30 = 58 non-fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 58 records are incorrectly predicted given that an instance is positive.

The transaction dataset has 920 non-fraudulent correctly classified records out of 952 records, that is, 920 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is positive.

Also, there would be 952 - 920 = 32 fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 32 records incorrectly predicted given that an instance is negative.

That is,

Predicted value

Active value Fraudulent Non-fraudulent

Fraudlent 30 58

non-fraudulent 32 920

The classification matrix is obtained by using the information related to the transaction data, which is classified into fraudulent records and non-fraudulent records.

The error rate is obtained as shown below:

The error rate is obtained by taking the ratio of $\left( {b + c} \right)(b+c)$ and the total number of records.

The classification matrix is, shown above

The total number of records is, $30 + 58 + 32 + 920 = 1,040$

The error rate is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\{\rm{Error}}\,{\rm{rate}} = \frac{{b + c}}{{{\rm{Total}}}}\\\\ = \frac{{58 + 32}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = \frac{{90}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = 0.0865\\\end{array}$

The percentage is $0.0865 \times 100 = 8.65$

(a)

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained by taking the rate ratio of b and $\left( {a + b} \right)(a+b)$ .

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown above and in the attachment

The error rate for truly fraudulent is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\FP = \frac{b}{{a + b}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{30 + 58}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{88}}\\\\ = 0.6591\\\end{array}$

The percentage is, $0.6591 \times 100 = 65.91$

(b)

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained by taking the ratio of d and $\left( {c + d} \right)(c+d)$ .

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown in the attachment

The error rate for truly non-fraudulent is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\TP = \frac{d}{{c + d}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{32 + 920}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{952}}\\\\ = 0.9664\\\end{array}$

The percentage is, $0.9664 \times 100 = 96.64$

6 0

3 years ago

A car is traveling at a steady speed. It travels 1 3/4 miles in 2 1/3 minutes. How far will it travel in ​? In 1 hour​?

A car is traveling at a steady speed. It travels 1 3/4 miles in 2 1/3 minutes. How far will it travel in ? In 1 hour?