Answer:
The American Civil War (1861–1865) became inevitable when the South opened fire on Fort Sumter in 1861.
By 1861, there were many obvious differences between the North and South. For example, the South's labor force was primarily agricultural. But less than half of the North's laborers worked in agriculture. The South was rural while the North had most of the largest urban centers. Slavery was an important institution in the South and Southern leaders were almost always slave owners. Although there were many differences between the two regions, the United States was one nation in 1860. Not until shots were fired at Fort Sumter did they become enemies on the battlefield.
There had been numerous factious quarrels between the North and the South before war erupted, and these occurred between 1820 and 1860. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise dealt with the question of slavery in the West.
Explanation:
Answer:
The modern era has seen the rise of powerful imperial states, while the post-classical era was characterized by smaller city-states. The modern era is characterized by global exchange of ideas and goods, while this kind of exchange was mostly regional during the post-classical era. D. Cultures are more isolated and distinct in the modern era, while classical cultures around the world shared many more characteristics. D. Goods are exchanged on a local level during the modern era, whereas global trade was more prominent in the classical era.
Explanation:
Without U-2, Eisenhower would have met with Kruschev, and they might have come to a positive resolution on the issue of Cuba.
<span>With Cuba resolved, Eisenhower would not have needed to launch the Bay of Pigs invasion; Castro bringing in missiles was a direct reaction to the Bay of Pigs. No Bay of Pigs, no Cuban Missile Crisis. </span>
<span>Without the Cuban Missile Crisis, tensions between the US and USSR would have been reduced. Still there obviously, but reduced. It is likely Kennedy could have come to an agreement to significantly slow, if not end, the arms race with the USSR. </span>
<span>And if Cuba and nuclear weapons were on a lower simmer, the US might have been less likely to stay in Vietnam. Both Yarmolinsky and McNamara had misgivings as early as 1963 about Vietnam. If the Cold War was cooler, they might have been able to keep that fire out. </span>
<span>It's possible the Cold War could have taken an entirely different turn if not for one airplane being shot down.</span>
Answer:
The second one
Explanation:
He had a vision of a more agrarian society. Plz give brainliest!
He was put in charge based on his previous military experience
