1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marta [7]
2 years ago
10

PLEASE HELP 50 POINTS!!!! (easy question)

History
2 answers:
pav-90 [236]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The Ottomans and Safavids often went to war with each other because of issues of leadership.

Explanation:

The Ottomans and Safavids often went to war with each other because of issues of leadership. The two empires would compete for territory in western Europe. The Ottomans and Safavids wanted to control the trade between the Muslim world, Africa, and East Asia.

mash [69]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

a. There was a lot of conflict between the Sunni and Shi'ite Muslims.

Explanation:

The Ottoman and Safavid empires were both muslim, but the Ottoman empire was sunni while the Safavid empire was Shiite. This caused conflict between the two empires along with fighting over territory, considering they bordered each other, so they went into a war called the Battle of Chaldiran. The Safavids lost the war due to lack of gunpowder technology.

You might be interested in
Which regions did the Roman Empire cover?
kari74 [83]
Portugal<span>, </span>Spain<span>, Andorra, </span>England<span>, </span>France<span>, Monaco, </span>Luxembourg<span>, </span>Belgium<span>, the Netherlands, </span>Germany<span>, </span>Switzerland<span>, Liechtenstein, </span>Italy<span>, San Marino, </span>Malta<span>, </span>Austria<span>, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Hungary, Albania, </span><span>Greece</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Why did Japan seek to expand beyond China?
Oduvanchick [21]
<span>Fear that Soviet expansion threatened Japan's interests in Asia
 </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Is the ratio 3 : 2 equivalent to ratio 6 : 4? How do you know the two ratios are equivalent?
Mazyrski [523]

Answer:

Yes.

Explanation:

6:4 simplifies down to 3:2

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare and contrast India &amp; Vietnam's independence movements in three sentences
Afina-wow [57]
<span> No matter if nation’s independence (de jure) was violent or non- violent, the consequences of decolonization, among them crippled economies, ethnic violence and even global conflict, eventually led to developing nations still not economically independent</span>
4 0
3 years ago
What was the outcome of the Worcester v. Georgia court case? A. The Cherokees won the right to stay on their land and were deeme
Evgen [1.6K]

Answer:  A. The Cherokees won the right to stay on their land and were deemed an independent nation.

<em>(That was a hollow victory though -- see last paragraph of explanation below.)</em>

<em />

Explanation:

The 1832 case, Worcester v. Georgia, ruled unconstitutional a Georgia law requiring non-Native Americans requiring a license from the state to be on Native American land.  In responding to the case, the Supreme Court asserted that the federal government is the sole authority to deal with a Native American nation.  From this Supreme Court assertion came the beginnings of tribal sovereignty within the United States for Native American nations -- that the US government would deal with them as domestic nations inside the United States.

The court case was named after Samuel Worcester, a Christian minister working among the Cherokee who was supportive of the Cherokee cause.  To block the activity of a man like Rev. Worcester, the state of Georgia passed a law prohibiting white persons to live within the Cherokee Nation territory without permission from the Georgia state government.  Worcester and other missionaries challenged this law, and the case rose to the level of a Supreme Court decision.  The decision by the Supreme Court, written by Chief Justice Marshall, struck down the Georgia law and reprimanded Georgia for interfering in the affairs of the Cherokee Nation.  Marshall wrote that Indian nations are "distinct, independent political communities retaining their original natural rights." 

But President Andrew Jackson chose not to enforce the court's decision.  He said at the time: "The decision of the Supreme Court has fell stillborn, and they find that it cannot coerce Georgia to yield to its mandate."  He told the Cherokee that they would need to operate under the jurisdiction of the state of Georgia or else relocate.  This was a step in the direction of what became known as the "Trail of Tears," when the Cherokee were removed from Georgia and moved to territory in Oklahoma.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • By the summer of 1642 the English people were divided. Name and describe the two groups
    14·1 answer
  • Question #6 help plss
    14·1 answer
  • McCarthyism is a term used for the accusations of any ______ activities in the US.
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a true statement about the California Gold Rush?
    15·1 answer
  • Why was the Civilian Conservation Corps one of the most popular New Deal programs in Georgia
    6·1 answer
  • The Fertile Crescent includes parts of Iraq, _____ and Israel.
    14·2 answers
  • What is a domesticate
    11·2 answers
  • A government is laissez-faire when it
    12·2 answers
  • 4.10 graded assignment: The spread of Islam
    6·1 answer
  • The crusader continued off and on for approximately <br>​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!