Answer:
Spanish Withdrawal
Explanation:
France gave all of their western land to Spain to keep the British out
Answer:
the Islam's identify the Quran as their holy book
Explanation:
the people believe it contains the word of God as revealed through Gabriel to the prophet of Muhammad in Arabic
Answer:
The Monroe Doctrine granted the United States the ability to independently intervene in the trading economy
Explanation:
Having the ability to act alone and be neutral to war situations allowed them to make economic decisions based off of what they felt was best for them to prosper.
Yes I think that each side has good things to say about the other side. This is because I think that many people's political viewpoints don't always perfectly align to one party or the other. In reality, life is much more complicated than picking one side. Sure some people might agree with policies from the Democrat's side, but they might see other Republican views to be valid as well. I like to think of it as a buffet of ideas, where people tend to pick and choose which talking points they magnetically snap to. We could have for example a socially liberal person but who supports conservative financial measures; or we could have someone who has very religious conservative morals, but supports liberal monetary policies.
In other words, it's unrealistic to assume people will be purely one party. Those who seem that way tend to be stuck in a bubble where it's like a feedback loop of talking points fed to them. Fox News is one example of this on the conservative side, while MSNBC is an example of this on the liberal side. Those stuck in this bubble would likely not have much nice things to say about the other side, if they have anything nice to say at all. However, I think to some (if not many) people, politics has become very toxic that they simply turn the tv off entirely. By "turn off", I mean literally turn it off or change the channel to something else. These people I'd consider somewhere in the middle in a moderate range. Furthermore, these moderates are likely to have some nice things to say about both sides, but they might have their complaints about both sides as well.
In short, if you pick someone from either extreme, then it's likely they'll have nothing nice to say about the other side. If you pick someone from the middle, then they might have nice things to say about both sides. It all depends who you ask. Also, it depends on how politically active they are.
Option 3 is correct. The sentence that is incorrect from the list of sentences is Animals made agricultural communities more dangerous.
<h3>What was the impact of the animals to the agricultural communities?</h3>
The animals in the areas were used to help the community and make work easier for humans. The animals were not considered as dangerous because they were a means of helping these communities. They helped to make work faster as well as easier for the people. Animals that make work easier include bull, ox, horse and so on.
Some animals are reared as part of the agricultural business. some are reared for milk, instance of this is certain breed of cow. Some animals are reared for fleece like some breed of sheep. Some are to produce meat. while some animals protects the farmers and their communities against danger, instance of animals trained for protection is dog.
Therefore from the sentences above, the sentence that is false is that Animals made agricultural communities more dangerous.
Read more on agriculture here: brainly.com/question/4755653
#SPJ1
