1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
laiz [17]
2 years ago
7

A watering method used to grow crops in the dry areas of the Middle East is known as __________.

History
1 answer:
oksano4ka [1.4K]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The answer is C. Irrigation.

Explanation:

Irrigation is the process of applying water to the crops artificially to fulfil their water requirements. Nutrients may also be provided to the crops through irrigation. The various sources of water for irrigation are wells, ponds, lakes, canals, tube-wells and even dams. Irrigation offers moisture required for growth and development, germination and other related functions.

The Middle East's climate and environment make living harsh, so the Middle East requires water resources and suitable land for agriculture. Much of the land that is available for producing food is destroyed by increasing desertification.

Desertification is a sweeping environmental problem, with vast effects in countries such as Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and Iran. Universal causes for a spread of arid environment are unsustainable agriculture practices and overgrazing.  

You might be interested in
The journals collected from the Long-Bell expeditions revealed information about the geography, wildlife, and __________ of Okla
gtnhenbr [62]
<span>The journals collected from the Long-Bell expeditions revealed information about the geography, wildlife, and the precious metals of Oklahoma. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which characteristic is unique to Japanese Buddhism? Prince Shotoku is worshipped. Mandalas have images of Shinto gods. It teach
Whitepunk [10]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
A thesis statement about the Glorious Revolution's influence on the American and French Revolutions would connect which phrases?
HACTEHA [7]

Answer:

The answers are:

limiting the power of monarchs and,

a government's responsibility to its peoples

Explanation:

I hope this helps!

6 0
3 years ago
Do you agree or disagree that education was the most important Contribuion of sir Syed Ahmed khan?
mr Goodwill [35]

Answer:

I agree with it .........

6 0
3 years ago
Why do priests need writing??? please help asap
lora16 [44]
Here is some information to help youWhy Do Priests Need Philosophy?
DECEMBER 27, 2014 BY FR. JAMES V. SCHALL, SJ

When he (Aquinas) was not sitting, reading a book, he walked round and round the cloister, and walked fast and even furiously, a very characteristic action of men who fight their battles in the mind. (G. K. Chesterton, St. Thomas Aquinas.) 1
Here we are touching on what is the most important difference … between Christianity on the one hand, and Islam as well as Judaism on the other. For Christianity, the sacred doctrine is revealed theology; for the Jew and the Muslim, the sacred doctrine is, at least primarily, the legal interpretation of the Divine Law. The sacred doctrine in the latter sense has to say the least, much less to do with philosophy than the sacred doctrine in the former sense. It is ultimately for this reason that the status of philosophy was, as a matter of principle, much more precarious in Judaism and in Islam than in Christianity: in Christianity, philosophy became an integral part of the officially recognized and even required training of the student of the sacred doctrine. (Leo Strauss, Persecution and the Art of Writing.) 2
Over the years, I have been invited to speak at a number of seminaries—to St. Charles in Philadelphia, to Notre Dame in New Orleans, to the seminary in Bridgeport, to St. Patrick’s in Menlo Park, and I once taught at the Gregorian University in Rome. Looking back on my own studies, I have often considered the three years we spent in philosophical studies at Mt. St. Michael’s in Spokane to be the most interesting and formative ones of my many years of clerical and academic studies. In recent years, I have heard a number of professors in Catholic colleges tell me, though this is by no means universal, that much more real faith and theology exist in the philosophy department than in the theology or religious studies departments of their school. An army chaplain also told me recently that a Catholic chaplain has an advantage over the protestant chaplain who relies on scripture alone to explain everything. Very often the problem is one of reason and good sense, one that is more amenable to reason than to faith, as such. It belongs to Catholicism to respect both reason and revelation as if they belonged together, which they do.
Here I want to talk about philosophical studies for the priesthood. I take as my models Msgr. John Whipple and Msgr. Robert Sokolowski, both diocesan priests in the school of philosophy at the Catholic University of America, both good priests and fine scholars. But first I would like to recall the lecture that I gave at the Bridgeport seminary several years ago. It was later published as an appendix to my book, The Life of the Mind. The lecture was called “Reading for Clerics.” In 2011, at the Theological College at the Catholic University of America, I gave a talk, entitled “Liberal Education and the Priesthood.” It was later published in the Homiletic & Pastoral Review.3
In both of these lectures, I wanted to point out something that I learned in a most graphic way from C. S. Lewis’ book, An Experiment in Criticism.4 The philosophic enterprise begins, I suppose, when we first take seriously the admonition of the Delphic Oracle. Socrates often quoted it, namely, that we should “know ourselves.” To “know ourselves” also means taking up Socrates’ other famous admonition, in the Apology, that “the unexamined life is not worth living.” But let us suppose that we, in fact, do know and examine ourselves, clearly no mean feat, as it is so easy to deceive ourselves about ourselves. Even with a good insight into ourselves, we still would not know much, even if we were Aquinas who seemed to know just about everything. We all remember that shortly before St. Thomas died, he stopped writing. He looked at all that he had written and realized that, compared to God, all he knew was “but straw,” as he quaintly put it.
We could go two ways with this incident from Aquinas. We could decide that it was not worth the effort if, after a lifetime of study, we knew very little even about our specialties, let alone about ourselves and others. Or, as is much the better way, we could be delighted in knowing what we did learn, however minimal it might be, compared to everything out there available to be known.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help me :( In first paragraph, why was the document written? And what two truths are stated in the beginning of the secon
    12·1 answer
  • Which is one way that the European debt crisis adversely affects the American economy?
    14·2 answers
  • Ndndjjdjejbrbdjjsnennfjcjsjnentnngnvjjxjsjsjebbtbjfjjxnsnennfjcjsbbebfnc<br> I'm
    14·2 answers
  • What reforms did Alexander II make? What happened to him as a result?
    6·1 answer
  • Of Wilson,George and Clemenceau who would have been most satisfied with the Treaty of Versailles?Explain why.​
    7·1 answer
  • Does anyone have the guided notes for the AP world history modern course on Edge*enuity?
    8·1 answer
  • When did sailors learn to ride the monsoons?
    10·1 answer
  • I need help on this question can someone help me I’ll give you brainlest ️
    15·1 answer
  • What was the effect of British imperialism?
    8·1 answer
  • Why did charles fourier consign nasty jobs such as cleaning latrines to adolescents? Why did charles fourier consign nasty jobs
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!