Well, both of them have a head of government, both run off of constitutions, and often constitutional monarchies have elected officials similar to a republic.
The U.S. Government used treaties as one means to displace Indians from their tribal lands, a mechanism that was strengthened with the Removal Act of 1830. In cases where this failed, the government sometimes violated both treaties and Supreme Court rulings to facilitate the spread of European Americans westward across the continent.<span>As the 19th century began, land-hungry Americans poured into the backcountry of the coastal South and began moving toward and into what would later become the states of Alabama and Mississippi. Since Indian tribes living there appeared to be the main obstacle to westward expansion, white settlers petitioned the federal government to remove them. Although Presidents </span>Thomas Jefferson<span> and </span>James Monroe<span> argued that the Indian tribes in the Southeast should exchange their land for lands west of the Mississippi River, they did not take steps to make this happen. Indeed, the first major transfer of land occurred only as the result of war.</span>
Answer: The answer is A: The marginal benefit of completing the project outweighs the marginal cost of the project.
Explanation: The marginal cost will be the cost incurred by the company in trying to complete the big project they acquired. The marginal benefit in this case will be the maximum amount of money they can get from this project upon completion. Thus, for the company to take a decision to halt their ongoing new office building, they have clearly seen that what they stand to gain from the project is huge when compared to just stalling on a new office building. With this decision they can complete the project, continue the new office building later on, and still have a lot of profit after doing so.
This is a highly contested question as to whether the US government should regulate this industry, although many think there should be "light" regulation, not full-on banishment.
