Answer:
The correct answer is to add humor and to heighten effect.
Explanation:
<h3>My defense and argument claim why tigers would beat most animals.</h3>
Tigers are very strong and intelligent animals. They can jump from place to place, leaping about 20 feet each time, which may help them in fights. Tigers also have good eyesight which allows them to see some things we do not. Then, someone argues to the claim, saying, "Tigers cannot beat every animal alone".
And this person is correct, tigers actually cannot beat every animal by themselves. Although they have mostly superior strength, there is one exception; A tiger goes against a group of strong foes. This is the case in which a tiger may fail to defeat its opponent. Hence, the tiger would only beat most animals in a fight, not all.
He realizes the Bob they killed was cocky and hot-tempered but really he had a life and feelings and brothers just like him
it's like, you have a goal but you don't have a goal,
if you aim for a target you can't see the chances are highly low of actually hitting it.
just like someone could have the goal to be a doctor, but if they don't make a path to where they can see themselves being a doctor and put faith in themselves they will never become a doctor
if i'm wrong i deeply apolapologies
D, to indicate his humorous intent. hopefully i helped xx