1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tatyana61 [14]
3 years ago
13

Plzz help me well mark brainliest if correct!!.....

History
2 answers:
g100num [7]3 years ago
8 0

A)

International technically means worldwide or nationwide so definitely more than one nation :)

KATRIN_1 [288]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A) affecting more than one nation

Explanation:

International is sort of like a different word for worldwide and since none of the other answers are stating more than 1 nation, the answer is A.

You might be interested in
Explain the term deontologist​
marissa [1.9K]

Answer:Deontology is a theory that suggests actions are good or bad according to a clear set of rules.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Why wasn't america great for african american in 1877-1910?
Klio2033 [76]

Answer:

Slavery was abolished in 1865, though the law says that you can't have african americans as slaves, it did not mean anything else, and white people had huge racist and prejudiced holdings against them, and because of this they were segregated and had been victims of many crimes because of their color because most americans did not like the fact slavery was abolished and treated them like dirt especially in the south.

Explanation:

Unrelated but this led to the great migration of African Americans from southern places to north, about 6 million traveled. (1916-1970)

4 0
3 years ago
What happened during the vietnam war?
alisha [4.7K]

The government hid the fact of how bad it really was

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Briefly explain why Arizona sided with the confederacy during the civil war
weqwewe [10]
One of the main factors leading up to the Civil War was territorial expansion into places like Arizona and Texas, with the question being whether these new states would be free or slave. It was in Arizona's interest to side with the slave states. 
3 0
3 years ago
Was the United States sending Japanese people to internment camps justified?
Inga [223]

Answer:

The Japanese attacks on Pearl Harbor changed the course of American lives forever; not only did it thrust America into declaring war on Japan, but it also changed the lives of the Japanese-Americans and Japanese people living in the United States. Congress and the President of the United States of America, Franklin D. Roosevelt, would pass legislation to remove people of Japanese descent from the West Coast.1 This legislation would become known as Executive Order 9906; the US army was tasked with detaining and removing Japanese people to relocation centers which became known as internment camps.2 Over this six month period over 122,000 men, women, and children would be incarcerated, and 70,000 of them were American citizens who were charged with no crimes.3 I would argue that this is one of the most egregious actions that the US Government has made in the 20th century; they passed an executive order to have their own citizens arrested and incarcerated with no charges filed against them. The lack of substantial evidence against Japanese Americans was evident, and the intelligence gathered by the agencies did not point to any acts of terror or sabotage on the American homeland. Furthermore, the actions were based on “military necessity”, but the government never did an investigation on whether these actions were justified.  Many of these people filed cases against the US Government in court, but the Supreme Court upheld the actions of the US Government. These actions should be very alarming to all citizens of the United States of America no matter what ethnicity; this was a blatant act of prejudice against people with Japanese heritage.  

The US Government used fear tactics along with spreading propaganda in order to justify the actions they would take to incarcerate Japanese Americans.4 They needed to get the public fearful of the Japanese American people living in the United States and they needed to have a few instances of Japanese sympathizers spying on Americans to make their claims legitimate. The best evidence for this would be the LA Times articles that appeared over a year span: they ran the headlines, “Japan Pictures As Nation of Spies”, “American Japs Removal Urged”, and “Lincoln Would Intern Japs”.5 As one could see this type of language and attention would instill fear into anyone who read the articles and thus create an atmosphere of fear and prejudice. Furthermore, an article wrote by Walt Lippmann six days before Executive Order 9906 was passed, stated “The enemy alien problem on the Pacific Coast, or much more accurately, the fifth column problem, is very serious and it is very special. . . .The peculiar danger of the Pacific Coast is in a Japanese raid accompanied by enemy action inside American territory. . . . It is the fact that the Japanese navy has been reconnoitering the Pacific Coast more or less continually and for a considerable period of time, testing and feeling out the American defenses. It is the fact that communication takes place between the enemy at sea and enemy agents on land. These are facts which we shall ignore or minimize at our peril. It is the fact that since the outbreak of the Japanese war there has been no important sabotage on the Pacific Coast. From what we know about Hawaii and about the fifth column in Europe, this is not, as some have liked to think, a sign that there is nothing to be feared. It is a sign that the blow is well organized and that it is held back until it can be struck with maximum effect . . . The Pacific Coast is officially a combat zone; some part of it may at any moment be a battlefield. Nobody's constitutional rights include the right to reside and do business on a battlefield. And nobody ought to be on a battlefield who has no good reason for being there”. The US Government used military nomenclature and fear as the main components to justify the incarceration of the Japanese and Japanese American’s to the American people.  

The last justification for Executive Order 9906 was due to the actions of a few high ranking officials in Congress and the military, but the most influential of these men was Lieutenant General John DeWitt. He was the commanding officer of the West Coast theatre of operations and was known for his lack of compassion and quick to respond to any threat. Furthermore, he was known to believe any intelligence that was produced on the Japanese Americans, and that he lacked common sense when dealing with all the reports. He was quoted as saying “ I have little confidence that the enemy aliens are law abiding or loyal in any sense

of the word. Some of them, yes; many, no. Particularly the Japanese, I have no confidence in their loyalty whatsoever. I am speaking now of the native-born Japanese-117,000-and 42,000 in California alone.”  

Explanation:

Hope I helped!

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the last step to creating an argumentative essay?
    5·2 answers
  • How did john marshall affect political development in america?
    9·1 answer
  • What did the Nazi-Soviet Pact accomplish for Germany?
    5·1 answer
  • What did Bohr's model of the atom include that Rutherford's model did not have?
    13·2 answers
  • European monarchs claimed that their authority to rule was given to them by what? And any opposition to them was a sin
    10·1 answer
  • How did the government help the railroads connect the West Coast with the
    8·1 answer
  • Look at the entire pic​
    11·2 answers
  • 1. List three new laws and how they led to the American Revolution. <br><br>help me!!​
    7·1 answer
  • What factors influenced American public opinion about the world war 1?
    12·1 answer
  • What product of industrialization most notably changed the look of American cities?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!