An individual who could trace a picture of a bicycle with his or her finger but could not recognize it as a bicycle is most likely to have sustained damage to the visual association area.
Explanation:
Visual association or association cortex area is the cortical area present in between the auditory, visual, somatosensory cortices.
All these cortices integrate through sensory, gustatory, visual, and auditory impulses. This complete sensory integration aids to recognize shapes, form, image, texture of various objects and their interrelation through higher-order association.
Damage to this visual association areas cause associative visual agnosia. With this condition, a person although is able to see or feel an object cannot recognize the object due to impairment of attention/recognition skill, intelligence.
A visually agnostic person, although can see, cannot identify an object by his/her sight; but can feel the object through touch, smell, or sound.
Answer: He acts in contradictory ways
Explanation:
Hamlet acts contradictory to what he had purposed in his mind for King Claudius.
Hello
A crowd<span> is a large number of people who gather together with a common short-term or long-term purpose.
</span>
A conventional crowd<span> is a collection of people who gather for a specific purpose.
</span>
An expressive crowd<span> is a collection of people who gather primarily to be excited and to express one or more emotions.
</span>
As its name implies, an acting crowd goes one important step beyond an expressive crowd by behaving in violent or other destructive behavior such as looting.
a fifth type of crowd is the protest crowd. A protest crowd is a collection of people who gather to protest a political, social, cultural, or economic issue.
Hope this helps
Plz mark me as Brainliest
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the second choice or letter B. "a logical fallacy."
In philosophy, a formal fallacy<span> (also called deductive </span>fallacy<span>) is a pattern of reasoning rendered invalid by a flaw in its </span>logical<span> structure that can neatly be expressed in a standard </span>logic<span> system, for example, propositional </span>logic<span>. An argument that is formally </span>fallacious<span> is always considered wrong.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!
Yes and no. But mostly yes.
The Mayans impressively developed a concept of zero as a number and as a placeholder. They did so in the 4th century AD, and what makes it especially impressive is that they more or less did so on their own, without borrowing from or exchanging ideas with other civilizations.
However, unlike ancient India, who developed the concept of zero around the same time, the Maya never applied to to mathematical calculations, using it mostly as a placeholder and a concept in their complex calenders.
Zero really becomes a powerful force in science and math when you begin applying the concept to equations. A number times zero is zero, a number divided by zero can't exist but theoretically is infinite, etc. Although the Mayans never applied zero to their impressive advancements in geometry, construction, etc, they did invent the concept essentially from scratch, which is an impressive feat that few other societies accomplished in the ancient world.
